G
Guestx
Guest
@the muntjac and I were recently having a discussion about what Van Damme's highest grossing film was. (I'm talking here about films where he was the lead actor.)
The answer is Timecop. It made $101 million worldwide. The runner-up is Street Fighter, with just a little over $99 million worldwide. Everything else trails WELL behind those two. Just for the record, his third-highest grossing film is Nowhere to Run, with a global take of $52 million.
When I really started to think about this, it surprised me. I remember thinking of Van Damme as a BIG STAR. A mega-star for a time in the early 90s.
So that got me to thinking about his competitors.
Terminator 2 made $520 million. But that's Terminator 2, right? I mean, that's a massive hit. An outlier. Okay, well try this on then: Eraser made $242 million. Yes, that's right, fucking Eraser made more than twice as much as Van Damme's most successful film.
How about some other examples? Cliffhanger made $255 million. Die Hard 2 made $240 million. And . . . oh my god, holy shit . . . Under Siege made $156 million. I never would've thought this was true, but Seagal beat Van Damme by a cool $50 million when comparing each actor's highest grossing movie.
WTF? Am I taking crazy pills?
So what's going on here? Was Van Damme never the mega-star that I thought he was during that time? Obviously I would expect Arnold and Sly's top films to have made more money, but I at least thought Van Damme would be competitive. And I don't even want to touch the fact that Steven Seagal also bested him so handily.
The answer is Timecop. It made $101 million worldwide. The runner-up is Street Fighter, with just a little over $99 million worldwide. Everything else trails WELL behind those two. Just for the record, his third-highest grossing film is Nowhere to Run, with a global take of $52 million.
When I really started to think about this, it surprised me. I remember thinking of Van Damme as a BIG STAR. A mega-star for a time in the early 90s.
So that got me to thinking about his competitors.
Terminator 2 made $520 million. But that's Terminator 2, right? I mean, that's a massive hit. An outlier. Okay, well try this on then: Eraser made $242 million. Yes, that's right, fucking Eraser made more than twice as much as Van Damme's most successful film.
How about some other examples? Cliffhanger made $255 million. Die Hard 2 made $240 million. And . . . oh my god, holy shit . . . Under Siege made $156 million. I never would've thought this was true, but Seagal beat Van Damme by a cool $50 million when comparing each actor's highest grossing movie.
WTF? Am I taking crazy pills?
So what's going on here? Was Van Damme never the mega-star that I thought he was during that time? Obviously I would expect Arnold and Sly's top films to have made more money, but I at least thought Van Damme would be competitive. And I don't even want to touch the fact that Steven Seagal also bested him so handily.