- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 1,131
- Reaction score
- 80
Yeah they're boring. I've been fast-forwarding a lot this season.
No he's not saying it now, but he got picked to come back after that one guy decided his neck pain was too bad to fight with. But he has to fight the other LHW from his team that's still in the competition.
There were four guys they could've brought back, and he was chosen. His reaction? He was MAD. He was mad he got to come back into the comp and fight again because he had to fight a teammate. He threw a tantrum over it.
It was very clear that he has a much bigger problem fighting people he knows than basically any other fighter. This episode totally proved what I said many weeks ago about him throwing that fight.
Ahhh right. Gotcha. Well, it really doesn't. Unless 'proves' means something completely different to you than it does to me, and probably everyone else. I think all that this proves is that he's not happy to fight a team mate. That's a very different thing than proving he threw a fight. No fighter is happy to fight a team mate and all would be upset about it. But there is literally nothing that proves he threw an earlier fight from that reaction though. They don't even have a connection. It's two unrelated, separate and distinct events that don't prove anything by themselves.
He didnt admit to throwing the fight did he? Well, that's really not calling anything then is it? All fighters would have a problem having to fight their team mates. Most flat out refuse. Nothing got proven, nothing got 'called' and you're just saying you're right simply because he's not happy to be fighting another team mate. Literally proves nothing and that doesn't mean you called anything. No fighters are happy to fight a team mate and many don't do it at all.
That doesn't prove he threw the fight though. He's just upset that he has to fight another team mate. That's all. Don't overanalyse it mate. That's a mighty great leap you're making to supposedly prove something. I wouldn't want to go to court with your 'proof'.
I have to say though, I'm interested as to how you came to the conclusion you 'called' something from a completely different fight, based on him being upset he has to fight another team mate if he wants his second chance? There is no correlation between the two, and from what you described above, it's two different situations that have nothing to do with each other.
Why would you assume you called something based on this? Seems like you're reaching in order to prove you're right. "I am right and random situations that have nothing to do with each other prove that I am right, because I am just right!"
Anyway, like I said, I still havent seen it yet so I have no idea. But, I would assume that they'd actually need to fight first in order for your theory to have any basis in reality rather than him simply being upset he has to fight a team mate, which is a perfectly natural reaction for anyone. All that proves is that he's not happy to fight a team mate. Nothing more, nothing less.
Last edited: