Where to begin?
Your first mistake is the facile presumption that competitors in any given sport are a monolithic block, such that any self-described example from any given background are equally interchangable with any other.
Next is the simple fact of credulously taking a freakshow exhibition seriously in the first place.
Then of course the casual ignorance displayed in a poorly formed hypothetical...
In light of such errors in reasoning, over all one can't help but get the sense of being one of those 'questions' that are not really questions at all. Rather, lead-ins for the chronically disingenuous or passive-aggressive to field what preconceptions they were already convinced of ahead of time.
In some ways it's an impressive and unusual phenomena, how you manage to be so consistent in how, no matter what sort of statement on the subject of grappling you've made heretofore it's managed to come out as something insulting, obstreperous, or obtuse on some level.