- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 4,859
- Reaction score
- 1,345
That's not actually me. And no because I still have a job
That's not actually me. And no because I still have a job
If you have "installed" 100's of computers but dont know simple tech terms like the ones in this thread, you really never knew what you were doing. Ignorance isnt bliss in technology.I am 49 and have installed probably hundreds of computers. I don't know what HDMI/Cat V cables are. I know what computer cables are though.
Some people like to use fancy words and numbers to describe simple things to make themselves feel smart. It does not mean they are smart. And people that can do shit without knowing what name and number goes with a fucking cord are not dumb.
Part of my job involves end user support for our 1000+ employees. When someone calls to report a problem with their network connectivity I ask them to look for a network cable that looks like an old telephone cable with a bigger plug. People easily figure that out.
When their monitor isn't working I ask them to check the cable that runs from their monitor to the docking station. Calling it a HDMI cable doesn't help them troubleshoot.
Most people need the function the cables provide and they don't give a damn about the name of the cable. It's similar to cars. I don't understand much of what goes into them. I just need the car to take me from point A to B.
If you have "installed" 100's of computers but dont know simple tech terms like the ones in this thread, you really never knew what you were doing. Ignorance isnt bliss in technology.
I wouldn't expect the typical person to know what a cat 5 cable is, more would know it if you include other alternative terms (internet cable, ethernet cable, network cable). Strictly speaking anyone graduating from college now is unlikely to have interacted with a cat 5 cable as cat 5e was introduced all the back in 2001.
Not knowing about a HDMI cable is a bit more strange but again maybe more would know of it if referred to it by more generic means.
Useful basic computer skills are considered to be those related to its operation and not the hardware itself. Much like how you can drive without knowing how to fix or maintain a car.
Exactly this. They probably just know “video cable” or “Ethernet cable,” or “network cable.”
Would TS know how to run a regression in MS Excel? Most people don’t. Most people don’t even know that is something you can do in Excel. Shit, I’ve worked in IT for over a decade and still don’t know much about hardware. I specialize in other things. I do know the difference between an HDMI cable and a VGA cable though. A lot of the programmers I used to work with couldn’t even connect their computer to a monitor though.
Calling something by its name isn't 'fancy talk,' it's the basis of communication. Though network cable is more descriptive than cat5, calling it cat 5 is like calling a coaxial cable an rg6.I am 49 and have installed probably hundreds of computers. I don't know what HDMI/Cat V cables are. I know what computer cables are though.
Some people like to use fancy words and numbers to describe simple things to make themselves feel smart. It does not mean they are smart. And people that can do shit without knowing what name and number goes with a fucking cord are not dumb.
Exactly this. They probably just know “video cable” or “Ethernet cable,” or “network cable.”
Would TS know how to run a regression in MS Excel? Most people don’t. Most people don’t even know that is something you can do in Excel. Shit, I’ve worked in IT for over a decade and still don’t know much about hardware. I specialize in other things. I do know the difference between an HDMI cable and a VGA cable though. A lot of the programmers I used to work with couldn’t even connect their computer to a monitor though.
Calling something by its name isn't 'fancy talk,' it's the basis of communication
I consider myself excellent at Excel and I had to look this up. I feel like you've picked an obscure thing to target. How many people are going to work with regression on a daily basis, inside or outside of Excel?
Well I was editing as you replied, see if my addendum makes sense.Yeah? So you want your doctor to talk to you like he/she would speak to a peer?
One of the key aspects of communication is understanding your audience and being able to communicate with them effectively. It isn't "fancy talk" as you suggest. What good does it do someone to use words, terms, etc that another person isn't going to grasp?
If a lot of people are ignorant of certain details then how can it be common knowledge?Well I was editing as you replied, see if my addendum makes sense.
It's one thing to not know tech details, but some shit is common enough that it's starting to sound like people defending ignorance.
Well I was editing as you replied, see if my addendum makes sense.
It's one thing to not know tech details, but some shit is common enough that it's starting to sound like people defending ignorance.
Calling something by its name isn't 'fancy talk,' it's the basis of communication
Communication is the act of conveying intended meanings from one entity or group or group to another through the use of mutually understood signs and semiotic rules.
There is a creeping tendency to use made up acronyms at SpaceX. Excessive use of made up acronyms is a significant impediment to communication and keeping communication good as we grow is incredibly important. Individually, a few acronyms here and there may not seem so bad, but if a thousand people are making these up, over time the result will be a huge glossary that we have to issue to new employees. No one can actually remember all these acronyms and people don't want to seem dumb in a meeting, so they just sit there in ignorance. This is particularly tough on new employees.
That needs to stop immediately or I will take drastic action - I have given enough warning over the years. Unless an acronym is approved by me, it should not enter the SpaceX glossary. If there is an existing acronym that cannot reasonably be justified, it should be eliminated, as I have requested in the past.
For example, there should be not "HTS" [horizontal test stand] or "VTS" [vertical test stand] designations for test stands. Those are particularly dumb, as they contain unnecessary words. A "stand" at our test site is obviously a test stand. VTS-3 is four syllables compared with "Tripod", which is two, so the bloody acronym version actually takes longer to say than the name!
The key test for an acronym is to ask whether it helps or hurts communication. An acronym that most engineers outside of SpaceX already know, such as GUI, is fine to use. It is also ok to make up a few acronyms/contractions every now and again, assuming I have approved them, e.g. MVac and M9 instead of Merlin 1C-Vacuum or Merlin 1C-Sea Level, but those need to be kept to a minimum.