Where did I say Nate was small?
Lmao...Then you know NOTHING about boxing, just like I already said.
Here was Floyd clearly "carrying" Conor by going all out with a combination in round 7 that Conor effortlessly dodges as if Conor is the real one from the matrix.
Look at that. Floyd is a such a master Oscar worthy actor he knows how to punch with 100% effort and miss on purpose 4 times in a row...
I guess Floyd was never really a boxer. He was a great actor.
Or perhaps...maybe just maybe...the reality is that Conor is a wayyy better elite level boxer then you haters were claiming, and was legit giving Floyd lots of issues with his leadhand game, speed, fients, IQ, countering etc.
Stick to MMA. Actually you don't even know that much about MMA either considering how much you downplay Conor. So heres some better advice: learn combat sports before typing away non sense on sherdog
Where did I say Nate was small?
Are you delusional?
Careful now, don't get your 5th account banned for doing this again...
Nate is the only fighter conor ever fought bigger than him. And...
And then scraped by with a majority decision...against a guy who has been dominated by multiple LW's.
Wow...how amazing
Yeah, I did ignore the "conor wasn't a big FW" shit, because that's straight up retarded.Did you just ignore everything ?
\/
"Conor was NEVER the biggest FW. Holloway was taller. Poirier was far bigger. Aldo has always had trouble cutting down to FW. Mendes may have been shorter but Mendes was a tank who outweighed Conor and was carrying much more muscle mass.
Now Jon Jones is actually terrible. No one has ever been as big for their division as Jones was for LHW.
Or how about Gsp fghting a lot of LWs.
Or how about Anderson being one of the biggest MWs in history?
Conor is one of only a few fighters continually fighting bigger guys, and MOVING UP and challenging himself. So how can anyone in their right mind even think about bringing that bullshit against Conor? Conor was already beating bigger opponents at FW, as a FW."
Nate WAS WAYYYY bigger then Conor.
Read this from the P4P
"Conor was a FW who over came Nate's 25lb weight advantage, 2 inch reach advantage, and 4 inch height advantage
-Conor's win over Nate is the greatest P4P win in MMA history - body percentage wise - lower weights.
-As per no one else in history has ever overcame that much size - in all areas percentage wise against an elite opponent"
Of course you haters do everything you can to ignore that rematch.
You mad because your hero Jones was exposed by Gustafsson for being nothing but size and youth.
Gus wasn't even that much bigger then Jones, it wasnt even close to how much larger Nate was to Conor. Gus was simply close enough in size to Jones and that was enough to expose Jones.
Jones started going to nothing but decisions once he stopped fighting senior citizens straight from the retirement home and he struggled mightily against his only 2 opponents worth anything (Gus and DC)
Jones is the one whos nothing but an over rated size bully who gets exposed when fighters are close in size or youth to him
Conor>>>Jones all day every day
Lol, I love how idiots like you cling to one punch or one gif and act like it proves something.1. You call Floyd the "greatest defensive boxer of all time" yet HOW can you not appreciate a 0-0 Conor hitting COUNTERS on Floyd then?
Conor was actually out countering Floyd the first half of the fight
That's incredible
So is Conor's boxing much greater then haters were claiming, or is Floyd over rated for getting countered by a 0-0 Conor? Can't have your cake and eat it. Pick your poison.
2. To even say "bu Floyd didnt even use his shoulder roll" PROVES how you know NOTHING about boxing
Floyd doesnt use the shoulder roll vs southpaws. Goodness you Conor haters are clueless lol. Shoulder roll vs southpaw leaves you open to the left
Floyd USES the high guard vs southpaws....exactly what he used vs Conor...exactly what Floyd uses vs every southpaw he faces...
Floyd's MAJOR weapon vs southpaws is the jab. Now look how many jabs he landed vs Conor
Conor shut down Floyd's jab/jab hand with superior lead hand control/and via establishing his own jab/while mixing up with fients.
You MMA fans who know nothing about boxing can't appreciate what Conor was doing. Cant realise just how mind blowing it was for Conor to actually have been shutting down Floyd the way he was until round 9.
Lol what?Yeah, I did ignore the "conor wasn't a big FW" shit, because that's straight up retarded.
Holloway: taller does not equal bigger
Poirier:
Same size
Aldo: clear size advantage for conor
Mendes:....are you retarded?
Jones is a tall LHW who actually cuts significantly less weight than several of his opponents, and has never been close to missing weight.
Jones also looks great on the scale, as opposed to this zombie motherfucker...
Jones beat Gus and DC (twice). conor is 1-1 with a stoppage loss and a majority decision against a LW gatekeeper.
What weight class does Poirier fight in, and is performing better in, again?Lol what?
Jones is the biggest fighter relative to division in MMA history
No one has ever been as big for their division as Jones was for LHW.
Jones was honestly so cowardly - a BIG HW, going down to LHW to look better vs senior citizens and smaller men...who still needed to use PEDs on top of all of that to look good vs those old men and smaller men
Yet still exposed by Gus.
Jones is probably the most over rated, manufactured hype job in UFC history
Jones doesn't even deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Conor since Jones is DISQUALIFIED from any all time great talks with all his failed PED tests.
But look, no one is denying that Conor isn't tall.
But frame wise Conor NEVER even came close to being the biggest FW
Nice job cherry picking 1 pic from 1 weight in.
Why don't you show the pics from Conor's weight cuts/weigh ins vs Brimmage, Brandao, Holloway, Poirier where Conor looked healthy as can be - and even looked like he could have cut 15lbs more pounds and still have looked healthy...oh that's right..because it would destroy your narrative
Bottom line is Poirier was much thicker/wider then Conor
Holloway and Conor were closer in frame.
But the fact you even conceed that Poirier and Conor were the "same size" still disproves your hater bullshit that Conor was the biggest FW...
And it certainly disproves your delusional non sense that Conor can't beat bigger opponents.
Checkmate! But I will continue to expose
Look at Holloway vs Aldo. Holloway is massive and had a much bigger size advantage over Aldo, then Conor supposedly did.
Regardless Conor and Max had a head to head and Conor out classed him, once again proving Conor still schools equal or bigger opponents due to skill
Unlike Jon Jones who gets exposed every time someone simply just comes close to matching his size or age (Gus, d-level OSP)
In fact, Holloway>>>>>Gustafsson by miles and miles
Conor out classing a taller, vastly superior Holloway>>>>>>Jones getting a gift robbery over an inferior Gustafssom who was still smaller then Jones but simply "close enough" in size to Jones to expose him.
That proves how much more skilled Conor is to Jones. It shows how much more superior Conor is to Jones.
You haters desperately latch on to that Nate fight because it's all you have
Try Conor's 9-1 UFC record instead
Try Conor's 22-3 record instead
Try looking at how Conor was on a 15 fight winning streak before the fluke short notice loss to Nate (longer wing streak then anything Jones has had)
Why do you keep ignoring how Nate literally looked 2 weight classes bigger then Conor?
And why do you keep ignoting how Conor out classed full camp Nate in the rematch just 5 months later
Here is the difference,
Jones gets beaten to death and exposed by Gus, and ducks a rematch for life
Conor loses a fluke short notice fight to Nate in where Conor dominated the 1dt round, and AVENGES the loss just 5 months later.
Never mind that Jones would have never accepted a short notice figh5 to begin with
You people clown Conor for losing on short notice
When Jones had the option to fight Mark Hunt on short notice, Jones refused and ducked
Jones wouldve been KOd by a smaller 10 losses Mark Hunt on short notice ...and that wouldve been far worse then losing to Nate...wonder what you people would've said then
LOL
