- Joined
- Apr 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 0
You didn’t answer my question, which was simply “What could have been in the memo that wasn’t.”
Instead went on two rants: one about the corruption of the FBI and one about the incompetence of the Democratic Party.
Now, for the third freaking time in this thread, I will ask you, what information could have made this a more effective rebuttal of the Nunes document.
And I don’t want nine text walls of GOP boilerplate; I want your words— just tell me why the information in this memo constitutes an ineffective reply. If you can’t do that— which so far you have not done— then all you are doing here is performing public fellatio for the GOP, not engaging in any sort of meaningful discussion.
Holy shit. You're one of the less intelligent posters here, but you're taking it to an obnoxious level here.
The magical information you want to be in the memo isn't there because it DOESN'T exist. How fucking simple can I make this?
For the dems to have an actual response that didn't embarrass them further we would have to be in an alternate reality where they shouldn't be embarrassed and are actually competent. Or, they could have lied.
The fact that you don't like the answer doesn't take away from your retarded premise.
I won't placate you any further. Grab a dictionary and stop asking stupid shit.