- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
- Messages
- 384
- Reaction score
- 70
I agree with this post other then one thing. Names, Finishing and types of wins are something that is judged subjectively. The NUMBERS on a record wins and losses even titles are concrete. Mayweather has said he is the best to play the game not the best boxer he says someone else can have that. The best to play the game that is boxing promotion, selling fights, marketing, branding. In MY opinion that is another reason why GSP is the GOAT. He is the best to ever do the entire MMA game from a fighter standpoint.Greatness is subjective. I think we can all agree that accomplishments determine how great a fighter is but some people value certain accomplishments over others. Some think winning is most important. Some think the quality of competition you've beaten is more important. Some people value the length of winning streaks. Some value performances (e.g. having more finishes than decisions).
I think Georges St. Pierre, Anderson Silva and Fedor Emelianenko are definitely Top 3 and would put Jon Jones at #4 with Demetrious Johnson at #5. Now among these fighters you could make arguments for who is #1 based on different criteria. I think we need to wait and see who pulls away as all of these fighters are still active. I predict that in 10 to 15 years we may see other fighters who are so good they completely change the conversation.