D
Deleted member 549255
Guest
Good striker, not great
You are definitely wrong. Hendricks was a better boxer than gsp.
GSP is a pretty decent fighter imo
No, for me its the other way around, Hendricks had a crazy right hand with a crazy power, but in pure fundamentals of boxing GSP was much betterYou are definitely wrong. Hendricks was a better boxer than gsp.
lol. How can you say that arguably the Greatest fighter of all time is "a pretty decent fighter".
lol.
You are definitely wrong. Hendricks was a better boxer than gsp.
Fine. He’s a good fighter. I might even put him in the top 3 all time at WW
A 2006 account should be able to pick up on sarcasm by now but I guess not.you?
I was so worried that such an authority like you wouldn't put him in top 3.. but now my life is complete. <Lmaoo>
A 2006 account should be able to pick up on sarcasm by now but I guess not.
Oh and I said I MIGHT put him in the top 3....but he did get finished by Serra in his prime so maybe not.
Yet Hendricks didn't win the first round striking, only one the first minute of the second round striking, got picked apart in the 3rd and 5th, and won the 4th on a trip. So much for "definitely better."You are definitely wrong. Hendricks was a better boxer than gsp.
Lovin the bandwagon aren't you?King Khabib is better and also undefeated
I'm just glad that GSP goat talk can finally stop.
Khabib is the new goat in town.
Zero losses bitches
Much more shallow resume so far, been getting better as of late. 4 ish more big title fights against top contenders over a couple years he'll have a claimKing Khabib is better and also undefeated
I would say GSP striking was good more so than great.
His take down threat is really what made is striking good. He obviously had worse striking than Hendricks, which is nothing to be ashamed of. Very good? You bet. Great? Nah.