Greatest MLB player of all time. (Pitchers excluded)

Best MLB player of all-time?

  • Joe Dimaggio

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hank Aaron

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lou Gehrig

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Honus Wagner

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reggie Jackson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ichiro

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jackie Robinson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pete Rose

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jimmie Foxx

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tris Speaker

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rogers Hornsby

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Johnny Bench

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    49
Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time. He was hitting more homeruns than whole teams combined. Nobody else has ever been so far above the competition
 
Alex Rodriguez should be up there
 
Last edited:
Babe Ruth is the best player of all time.

Barry Bonds is the best player I saw play.
 
Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time. He was hitting more homeruns than whole teams combined. Nobody else has ever been so far above the competition
I thought I saw historians cite something was different back then like maybe shittier overworked pitchers where there wasn't 5 man rotations and maybe larger ballparks. The HR totals per player per season were really low back then.
 
I thought I saw historians cite something was different back then like maybe shittier overworked pitchers where there wasn't 5 man rotations and maybe larger ballparks. The HR totals per player per season were really low back then.

That was true for every player back then. He was that much better than the competition is what I was saying. There were years that he had three times as many homeruns as the second place guy. He also pitched and hit for a high average with a lot of walks, that's why I think he's the best of all-time
 
Probably Williams, Mays, or Ruth. Didn't see them play. Best pure hitter I've seen was Tony Gwynn. Best player is probably Trout the way he is going if we're talking natty.
 
If you don't include pitching, then I think Willie Mays, his family was second to none on top of amazing offense.

If you include pitching then you have to say Babe Ruth , no one can really compare.
 
Probably Williams, Mays, or Ruth. Didn't see them play. Best pure hitter I've seen was Tony Gwynn. Best player is probably Trout the way he is going if we're talking natty.
LOL at Trout being natty. He's got some of the best designer PEDs in the game. No shame in that either. He's currently the best baseball player on the planet.
 
Babe Ruth is the greatest hitter of all time. He was hitting more homeruns than whole teams combined. Nobody else has ever been so far above the competition

He was so far above the competition because the competition was a joke.
 
He was so far above the competition because the competition was a joke.

I disagree on the competition being a joke. There were a lot of great players back then who I think would've been great no matter when they played. You think guys like Joe Jackson, Walter Johnson, Tris Speaker were a joke?
 
I disagree on the competition being a joke. There were a lot of great players back then who I think would've been great no matter when they played. You think guys like Joe Jackson, Walter Johnson, Tris Speaker were a joke?

Like half the league consisted of fat white guys who would drink in the dugout. They didn’t even have minorities in the league yet ffs. Those guys wouldn’t even cut it in the minors today.
 
Like half the league consisted of fat white guys who would drink in the dugout. They didn’t even have minorities in the league yet ffs. Those guys wouldn’t even cut it in the minors today.

You don't have any idea how they would do today, it's a poor argument. I could just as easily say Ruth would've hit 1,000 homeruns if he took steroids.
 
You don't have any idea how they would do today, it's a poor argument. I could just as easily say Ruth would've hit 1,000 homeruns if he took steroids.

If you were to pin players from today vs the 20’s.. they’d absolutely destroy those guys. They never saw 100mph heat, sliders, shifts or even black and Latin players ffs. Imagine what today’s HOF players would do offensively if none of those existed? Now you can argue hypothetically that if Ruth were born in the 80s or 90s he’d be a good major leaguer with modern training and nutrition. But the odds of him being as dominant in today’s age are hilariously slim just based on sheer population alone. He put up great numbers when there were maybe a few thousand people even playing baseball in his era, but today there are millions of players who play baseball growing up.

You’re taking 1 guy who dominated out of a few thousand.

Compare that to someone who’s dominated out of hundreds of thousands if not millions.

I’ll take the guys who excelled in the larger talent pool.

Obviously most of the situation is hypothetical, but the facts support modern/recent era players.

- much larger talent pool/competition
- advanced scouting/metrics
- shifts
- overall better pitching

You can say Ruth is the GOAT based on his era, but if you do that you can’t say he’s better than bonds or trout because they played in different eras. Personally, I’d say modern and recent players are much more skilled than early generation players.
 
Last edited:
If you were to pin players from today vs the 20’s.. they’d absolutely destroy those guys. They never saw 100mph heat, sliders, shifts or even black and Latin players ffs. Imagine what today’s HOF players would do offensively if none of those existed? Now you can argue hypothetically that if Ruth were born in the 80s or 90s he’d be a good major leaguer with modern training and nutrition. But the odds of him being as dominant in today’s age are hilariously slim just based on sheer population alone. He put up great numbers when there were maybe a few thousand people even playing baseball in his era, but today there are millions of players who play baseball growing up.

You’re taking 1 guy who dominated out of a few thousand.

Compare that to someone who’s dominated out of hundreds of thousands if not millions.

I’ll take the guys who excelled in the larger talent pool.

Obviously most of the situation is hypothetical, but the facts support modern/recent era players.

- much larger talent pool/competition
- advanced scouting/metrics
- shifts
- overall better pitching

I guess we'll just disagree on this. Ruth had elite hand eye coordination, that translates in baseball, he had power without modern training methods as well, which would only improve if he were coming up today.

Like you said, that part of it is all hypothetical. The facts are he hit over 700 homeruns with a lifetime batting average over .340, no one else has ever done that
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,679
Messages
55,433,993
Members
174,775
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty
Back
Top