GOP blocks access to Trumps tax returns.

That's Presidential privilege, and something tells me you didn't give two fucks when Obama was exercising that power.
Show me the convicted violators of the rights others that he pardoned. What was his stance on Stop and Frisk, I wonder?

And really? But Obama? That's really all you've got left? Something tells me you don't give two fucks about anything other than trying to score verbal points on a karate forum but it's not going so well these days.
 
There's an exception to every rule. In a perfect world, almost nothing about the business dealings of the President of the United States should be private.

yes or no
 
yes or no
I don't get to make these kinds of decisions, so my personal opinion is moot but I said I would make an exception for Trump. Fuck that scum bag. He doesn't care about the rights of others. Otherwise, no. I'm not a lawmaker or a journalist and it's not my country so I get to have these sorts of opinions.
 
do you support a law that takes away someone's right to privacy. yes or no?

everyone wants to dodge the question.
Incidentally, a perusal of the article shows it's not even certain whether there would be any legal barrier to requesting the returns to be reviewed in a closed session.
 
I don't get to make these kinds of decisions, so my personal opinion is moot but I said I would make an exception for Trump. Fuck that scum bag. He doesn't care about the rights of others. Otherwise, no. I'm not a lawmaker or a journalist and it's not my country so I get to have these sorts of opinions.

so your answer is no, you dont support it, but you'd make an exception for Trump?

if you abandon a principle when it's convenient, then it's not really a principle.

it goes back to my original post, i'm not going to abandon my principle, my support of rights and rights to privacy, just to hurt Trump. that would be the worst possible outcome, if i let that fucker change me.


now, thank you for answering the question. i can accept not following along with your principles out of hatred much more than i can the lack of integrity to just admit that that's what you're doing. its obvious to both of us so just say it. you did, the others didn't. shit posters and worthwhile poster.



Incidentally, a perusal of the article shows it's not even certain whether there would be any legal barrier to requesting the returns to be reviewed in a closed session.

right, the issue is releasing to the public. i said i wouldn't support that, and when presented with "im ok with it cus fuck him", i asked how that matches up with their views on rights to privacy. shit posting commenced.
 
lol... Really?

Ever heard of Stormy Daniels? Campaign contribution violations
Money Laundering.
Violating nepotism laws
Obstruction of justice

If Trump refuses to speak to Mueller he is obstructing justice.

The president "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," reads Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution

If Trump DOES speak it's almost a guarantee he will perjure himself because he is not disciplined enough not to.

If Trump doesn't speak with Mueller he could in violation of of the above law.

Not to mention gross incompetence. I can assure you Mueller has so much dirt on Trump and family the report is going to be thousands of pages long
So... Nothing supported or impeachment worthy? Keep tossing that Hail Mary on the soccer field. You'll eventually get that hat-trick you're looking for.
 
so your answer is no, you dont support it, but you'd make an exception for Trump?

if you abandon a principle when it's convenient, then it's not really a principle.

it goes back to my original post, i'm not going to abandon my principle, my support of rights and rights to privacy, just to hurt Trump. that would be the worst possible outcome, if i let that fucker change me.


now, thank you for answering the question. i can accept not following along with your principles out of hatred much more than i can the lack of integrity to just admit that that's what you're doing. its obvious to both of us so just say it. you did, the others didn't. shit posters and worthwhile poster.





right, the issue is releasing to the public. i said i wouldn't support that, and when presented with "im ok with it cus fuck him", i asked how that matches up with their views on rights to privacy. shit posting commenced.

Not speaking for the other posters, I would point out that my statement was essentially hyperbole. It's not really abandoning a principle when it's a hypothetical about a situation over which I would literally never have any say and therefore have an easy route to a response that is more about expressing my feelings toward Trump than the actual ethics of the situation. Again, I'm not a jurist or legislator, nor a journalist so I can afford this type of opinion.

I can assure you if my post were in fact writing for a different audience, I would take no such liberty. I doubt many others ITT would either FWIW.

Edit: and I don't care to see them, but someone should. Preferably someone with the authority to do something about it if something fishy is found, which, as mentioned about, would be entirely legal and no violation of anyone's rights.
 
Last edited:
So... Nothing supported or impeachment worthy? Keep tossing that Hail Mary on the soccer field. You'll eventually get that hat-trick you're looking for.

So you ignore everything I posted because either A) Foxnews doesn't report it so it cant be true or B) You don't like it?

This whole Stormy Daniels thing alone will do him in. The rest is icing

(Imagine if the headline was "Obama pays a porn star to keep quiet")

You empty right wing head would be spinning so fast... But because it's Trump and liberals are butthurt it's ok?
 
This whole Stormy Daniels thing alone will do him in.

giphy.gif
 
"'Fire And Fury' is the end of Trump. He'll never be able to show his face again!"

- @zebby23


Turn off CNN, bro.

Exactly... That is just 1 piece of the puzzle

I love how you would rather be correct on an online forum than have a president you can respect. It's crazy to me.

You ever wonder why the Mueller investigation isn't over? Everyday Trump gives him more and more ammo. This investigation may last the entire presidency because there is always more and more to investigate. That's ok as long as liberals are butthurt though right? haha
 
Exactly... That is just 1 piece of the puzzle

I love how you would rather be correct on an online forum than have a president you can respect. It's crazy to me

Go back to bed, Zebster.
 
Go back to bed, Zebster.

Nice argument lol...

Is Fox and Friends over yet. It's hilarious trying to debate the uneducated.

I'm sure according to you the whole Mueller investigation is a hoax because Trump said so HAHAHAHA
 
Nice argument lol...

Is Fox and Friends over yet. It's hilarious trying to debate the uneducated

You presented no position to debate. You're spouting nonsense.

Yes Zeb, Stormy Daniels will end the Trump Presidency, just like "Fire and Fury" did.


You're a child.
 
You presented no position to debate. You're spouting nonsense.

Yes Zeb, Stormy Daniels will end the Trump Presidency, just like "Fire and Fury" did.


You're a child.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. You are right... I trust you more than Robert Mueller and all the fake news sites. You have the inside info HAHA.

Trump is being sued right now by good ole Stormy but I bet Fox News didn't tell you that. I sometimes wish I could be willfully ignorant. Life would be SO much easier.

Also to recap... Here are your arguments
Turn off CNN
Go back to bed
You're a child

Such wisdom...
 
Trump is being sued right now by good ole Stormy but I but Fox News didn't tell you that. I sometimes wish I could be willfully ignorant. Life would be SO much easier

Yes, and she has no grounds, and the lawsuit will be thrown out.

Seriously though, even if she won(she won't), what is she going to say to get Trump impeached, you dolt?

All you're doing here, is exposing yourself as an emotional, irrational lefty, with absolutely no grasp on how things work in the real world.
 
Yes, and she has no grounds, and the lawsuit will be thrown out.

Seriously though, even if she won(she won't), what is she going to say to get Trump impeached, you dolt?

All you're doing here, is exposing yourself as an emotional, irrational lefty, with absolutely no grasp on how things work in the real world.

More insults because you are too insecure to actually have a discussion lol.

Imagine how you would have acted if the headline was "Obama pays hush money to a porn star" You and your trailerpark friends would be outside in your wife beaters stompin around the old trailer park but since it's Trump it's no big deal.

You do realize Mueller is VERY interested in this whole Stormy Daniels thing but you wouldn't know that watching Fox and Friends.

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...rants-federal-investigation-article-1.3861884

You won't read it though. lol

Let me ask you, why do you think the investigation is taking so long? Also, why does Mueller want to interview EVERYONE Trump has dealt with since running for office? Is he bored?
 
Claims Mueller is VERY interested. Posts link to Op-Ed, that says nothing of the sort.


ROFL. Keep 'em coming little Zeb.

So Mueller is not interested in this? Curious as to why you think so? Are you even convinced there is an investigation going on? I need to know the level of your ignorance before continuing.

Should I just watch Fox and Friends to get your opinion because you sure never offer anything up. No facts, no opinion just... I'm not really sure you offer tbh
 
Back
Top