Golovkin's Coach: Jacobs Rematch is 3 or 4 Fights Down The Line

cant see triple L fighting 4 more times
already 35 and looking human af
wants canelo and then retirement
 
Outside of Canelo and a Jacobs rematch, there really aren't any other worthwhile fights at MW for the time being (granted, that can change pretty quickly). Maybe they're considering options at 168.
 
Golovkin is the champion and Jacobs was the challenger. Jacobs did really well but GGG shouldn't have to drop all his plans just because a challenger did well. They will probably fight in the future and it will probably be a bigger fight if they can get some other wins in the meantime.
Champion bs challenger argument? Cool story bro.
 
In 2-3 fights Jacobs will be at 168 if not 175 anyway.

Poor form to cheat weigh in, coming in 20 lbs heavier than his opponent than demanding a rematch.
 
In 2-3 fights Jacobs will be at 168 if not 175 anyway.

Poor form to cheat weigh in, coming in 20 lbs heavier than his opponent than demanding a rematch.
The weigh in that he didn't cheat? Good one.
 
That's some bullshit right there.... UNLESS his next opponent is actually Canelo, in which case, OK, but after that, either Canelo (depending on how that goes) or straight back to Danny.

WTF, the dude can't starve himself forever.
 
In 2-3 fights Jacobs will be at 168 if not 175 anyway.

Poor form to cheat weigh in, coming in 20 lbs heavier than his opponent than demanding a rematch.
Did he miss weight?
 
Did he miss weight?
No, he made weight but to keep his belt he had to make weight the following day I think, @RR can say better but I think that was the situation.
 
Why are people saying that there are no meaningful fights beyond Alvarez and the rematch with Jacobs? Golovkin wants to unify, Saunders has the WBO belt. That sounds meaningful enough.
 
Bjs vs you would be as exciting, golovkin had a very arguable win vs Jacobs, if he is the big man he asks for that if not grovel to canelo if not waste our time with Saunders.
 
In 2-3 fights Jacobs will be at 168 if not 175 anyway.

Poor form to cheat weigh in, coming in 20 lbs heavier than his opponent than demanding a rematch.
Because you, a fan , did not like a legal, strategic, and financial tactic...does not = "cheat."
You are misusing the word cheat big time. Kind of kills any point you may have.

If i dont like uppercuts and a fighter wins by an uppercut KO, that fighter did not "cheat" to win.
 
Why are people saying that there are no meaningful fights beyond Alvarez and the rematch with Jacobs? Golovkin wants to unify, Saunders has the WBO belt. That sounds meaningful enough.
I agree. Good stay busy fight. Cool press and ceremonial to unify the titles.
Most people dont like it because BJS is not a respected champ. He ducks. He wont fight other legit competition. Hes been holding the belt hostage.
The only people who want to see the fight want to see BJS catch a brutal beat down. Not because it would be a competitive fight.
 
Jacobs should fight Saunders in the meantime.
 
Bjs vs you would be as exciting, golovkin had a very arguable win vs Jacobs, if he is the big man he asks for that if not grovel to canelo if not waste our time with Saunders.

What are you talking about and to whom are you referring?
 
Back
Top