- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
- Messages
- 24,792
- Reaction score
- 599
Fuck no
It wasn't only the body shot. Hooker was getting beat everywhere and it was turning out to be a prolonged beating. The Drago vs Smith fight was actually a little competitive and that body shot was just one shot, not many like the Hooker fight.
Nah, they need to decide if mma is a sport with rules or a bloody show. I would prefer the second, so is Dana White, but you can't have people getting killed on tv nowadays.Boxing stops fights way quicker in those situations. If the Hooker fight was a boxing match it would've been stopped sooner. Not sure what's the problem with the refs in MMA. The point is, if the corner or the ref won't stop the fight when a fighter is defenseless and taking serious damage, there should be a third option.
I think the doctor already has the authority to stop a fight mid-round, at least in some jurisdictions. Although I can't cite you a specific rule, I've seen it happen in boxing and don't see why that rule would be different in MMA.
This is totally true because they are trained to know when a fight should be stopped but aren't invested in the fight other than watching itGive the commentator's towels. They seem to know when a fight should be stopped more then the Ref, or the fighters Corner.
I'm sure you get disqualified if you do.You can't even throw a towel in mma.
It's a foul for throwing things in the ring not an admission of defeat.
It was more of a joke but now that im thinking more about it, I think there should be analyst, possibly two that could agree to throw a towel in if the Ref or Corner doesn't. Yes i know people are saying the corner can't throw in a towel, but thats just absurd that the only person that can is a Ref. Maybe the Analyst could tell a Ref to stop a fight via earpiece in a case like this.This is totally true because they are trained to know when a fight should be stopped but aren't invested in the fight other than watching it
You can't even throw a towel in mma.
It's a foul for throwing things in the ring not an admission of defeat.
It wasn't one body shot that was the problem, it was the accumulation of shots to the body and the head that Hooker wasn't able to defend
Yeah, if the corner or the ref won't do it. The corner thinks they and their fighter are too tough to quit ever, the ref is terrified of making the wrong decision and getting dragged for it or not getting another job so as a last resort, the ringside physician should be given the power to stop the fight alsoGive the doctor a towel to do the referee's job?
For situations like Hooker/Barboza or Velasquez/Dos Santos when one fighter is basically defenseless and is taking a prolonged, unnecessary, and brutal beating on the feet and for whatever fucked up reason, the corner or the ref does not step in to stop the fight. I don't expect a warrior like Dan Hooker to quit on the stool but if his own corner or the ref won't take steps to protect the fighter, maybe the ringside doctor who has taken a Hippocratic Oath to protect life will throw the towel when everyone else is too corner-tough or afraid of criticism to do so. Remember when Nick Diaz threw the towel for his brother? that was the right thing to do.
Right, also why the ref did nothing wrong hooker was throwing big shots right till the end. The corner could be faulted for not saying their guys done. But in mma a standing compitant fighter shouldn't be stopped. The ref also stopped it immediately as hooker hit the ground too zero gnp allowed. Yet people are shiting on some A plus mma reffing.