- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Messages
- 362
- Reaction score
- 315
I like gi, but I wish my gym trained more no-gi.
from what I understood, its because there are less injuries in gi than no gi. I somewhat agree with that even though the bumps that are more common in slippery no-gi are pretty minor still.This is exactly the case where I see it. Every gym around me seems to be 5-6 days a week gi and 1-2 no gi. You really don't get the option to be exlusive or at least primarily no gi
I used to be one of those guys who complained about the gi when I first started because of all the grip fighting and only trained no gi like every wrestler.
Now it’s all Gi for me.
from what I understood, its because there are less injuries in gi than no gi. I somewhat agree with that even though the bumps that are more common in slippery no-gi are pretty minor still.
I guess its a business and the gi helps slow everyone down and not flail around too much.
I couldn't agree more. I find that a lot of my training partners in gi can make it through a round just by having a good grip on their opponents gi. It's just not very natural IMO.Former wrestler here so naturally I prefer no gi. I train much more in gi (5x a week vs. 1 in no gi) but I am much better in no gi. I struggle with the grips and I feel as though whomever can use grips more effectively wins. I also feel that gi is a much slower paced match where people use the gi to drag the pace down. It's frustrating.
For what it's worth I see more injuries in the gi but I think no gi injuries are more surface level and maybe stand out more. I've seen way more knees popped from delariva or 50/50 guards where people use the lapels or other grips to sort of hold people in positions where their joints are unstable. Or getting caught up in omoplatas situations with lapel control too. Most of the injuries I've seen in no gi are from takedown scrambles especially after the floor gets slippery.from what I understood, its because there are less injuries in gi than no gi. I somewhat agree with that even though the bumps that are more common in slippery no-gi are pretty minor still.
I guess its a business and the gi helps slow everyone down and not flail around too much.
If all you have is Gi training, how helpful is that in a street fight?
I usually hate self defense debates in general but I have always agreed with this point and I'm confused that a good chunk of people don't.You better hope they're wearing a heavy coat lol
That's one of the common argument I hear for it, that people are going to be wearing a jacket. It's very likely even in the cold someone who wants to start a fight will take it off first. As some of the earlier post suggested, if you train in the gi but using no gi grips (under and over hooks) and don't rely on gi chokes and grips. No gi is definitely the better way to get prepared for self defense in a street fight
I don't do bjj for fighting ability. It is a non-factor to me. I grapple because its fun.If all you have is Gi training, how helpful is that in a street fight?
For what it's worth I see more injuries in the gi but I think no gi injuries are more surface level and maybe stand out more. I've seen way more knees popped from delariva or 50/50 guards where people use the lapels or other grips to sort of hold people in positions where their joints are unstable. Or getting caught up in omoplatas situations with lapel control too. Most of the injuries I've seen in no gi are from takedown scrambles especially after the floor gets slippery.
If all you have is Gi training, how helpful is that in a street fight?
Personally I feel like I have to think more and use technique in Gi vs No Gi were you can get away with creating scramble a lot imhoWhat made you change your mind?