1.) If you're going to rely upon typos as evidence that someone is familiar with a field, you should spell Mueller's name correctly. You also should avoid making things up about my position that you can't actually establish. But, like I said, you're hanging on those as a red herring to avoid substantive discussion.
2.) This is not an argument. It's a statement that Sullivan doesn't like overzealous prosecutors, followed by a bunch of rumors, tied up with a speculative conclusion.
3.) Under what theory of law is Sullivan going to "smash" the Flynn case? Prosecutors are required to disclose evidence favorable to the defense before the trial begins (this was the issue in the Stevens case - see Brady), but that does not invalidate pretrial guilty pleas (see Ruiz, 2012).
4.) As an edit, let's reiterate that your theories of exculpatory evidence are painfully speculative and incredibly childish to anyone who actually read the publicly released documents for Flynn's plea.
