- Joined
- Feb 16, 2014
- Messages
- 11,854
- Reaction score
- 7,757
This is a very interesting study. http://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/31694
"Conclusion: Our results do not support the association between CVDs and saturated fat, which is still contained in official dietary guidelines. Instead, they agree with data accumulated from recent studies that link CVD risk with the high glycaemic index/load of carbohydrate-based diets. In the absence of any scientific evidence connecting saturated fat with CVDs, these findings show that current dietary recommendations regarding CVDs should be seriously reconsidered."
If you actually read the study in its entirety, it's not anti carb, it's anti high glycemic carb/load, which actually isn't outlandish when you think of it, and they do note that physical activity is a variable that may change whether high Glyc index/load may alter.
"Conclusion: Our results do not support the association between CVDs and saturated fat, which is still contained in official dietary guidelines. Instead, they agree with data accumulated from recent studies that link CVD risk with the high glycaemic index/load of carbohydrate-based diets. In the absence of any scientific evidence connecting saturated fat with CVDs, these findings show that current dietary recommendations regarding CVDs should be seriously reconsidered."
If you actually read the study in its entirety, it's not anti carb, it's anti high glycemic carb/load, which actually isn't outlandish when you think of it, and they do note that physical activity is a variable that may change whether high Glyc index/load may alter.