- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 228
Who would have won? I think this Floyd would still have enough to outbox Thurman and win a UD.
Maidana gave Floyd a lot to think about because he has legit one punch fuck your couch power.
Thurman has pop but fancies himself a boxer and when you try to box Floyd and you don't have ridiculous speed you get humiliated.
Thurman would have been humiliated.
Mayweather, even now could out box Thurman to a comfortable decision...
honestly, I think Porter would have a better chance at defeating Mayweather than Thurman.
Maidana gave Floyd a lot to think about because he has legit one punch fuck your couch power.
Thurman has pop but fancies himself a boxer and when you try to box Floyd and you don't have ridiculous speed you get humiliated.
Thurman would have been humiliated.
It had a lot to do with style, too (perhaps more than just pure power). Maidana was a pressure fighter with decent footwork, infighting ability, and the willingness to make it dirty. Thurman isn't that kind of fighter.
It had a lot to do with style, too (perhaps more than just pure power). Maidana was a pressure fighter with decent footwork, infighting ability, and the willingness to make it dirty. Thurman isn't that kind of fighter.
Floyd went into that fight trying to prove something and made the fight closer than it should have been. Giving any top ranked fighter chances like that is a risk. We saw in the rematch that he still had all the ability.Who would have won? I think this Floyd would still have enough to outbox Thurman and win a UD.
I don't recall ever thinking Maidana was a dirty fighter. He was a bully and loved to trade inside but I don't remember a bunch of low blows or any intentional headbutts or elbows or faked injuries. I thought he was clean especially for his style.
I don't recall ever thinking Maidana was a dirty fighter. He was a bully and loved to trade inside but I don't remember a bunch of low blows or any intentional headbutts or elbows or faked injuries. I thought he was clean especially for his style.
Floyds toughest fights were always guys who had less than textbook style.It had a lot to do with style, too (perhaps more than just pure power). Maidana was a pressure fighter with decent footwork, infighting ability, and the willingness to make it dirty. Thurman isn't that kind of fighter.
Floyds toughest fights were always guys who had less than textbook style.
Well, Oscar too I guess.I sort of agree, but then again, a guy like Jose Luis Castillo was a fairly textbook pressure fighter (excellent footwork, very good on the inside, etc.).
Thurman would be beat fairly easy.
I think he was quite a handful in this fight.
I should point out though that I haven't seen many Maidana fights (saw his one with Broner and two with Mayweather) but he was kinda dirty in all of them