Female Darren Till lookalike (timestamped)

[Sano]

I agree he still has his agenda, but he is still cordial when debating somebody. While a lot of left and right wing pundits will just sit there and interrupt the person they disagree with. He's like a right wing Bill Mahr. Bill is very set in his opinions, but will still at least let his opposition talk.

I think you're being a bit naive. While it's true he's not shouting over someone, he's using a very different but equally obvious tactic. First of all he is not disagreeing with an opinion someone has, he is disagreeing with the basis of their identity and human experience. However polite, that is rough to deal with without getting emotional.

He is knowingly attempting to be deceitful. Trying to play the nice guy, but hand picking "studies" and misrepresenting facts. Notice how he's switching between a biological argument and then going straight to solipsism, nevermind that studies show there is in fact biological differences that pertains to the way we view gender and sexual identify.

When he asked "How do you know you were born trans?" and the guest applies "How do you know you were born heterosexual?", he had an answer obviously being that he has male hormones and like women (which is very simplified and may not be entirely true, but that's another thing). What she should have asked would be "Why do you like certain type of features in women, over others? Why do you like the color green more than blue?" to make him consider why that is.

I'm not saying that liking a certain color or liking redheads is the same as being attrackted to the same sex or identifying as another gender. He was trying to paint her as a solipsist without reason, or more bluntly put, a nutcase. She should throw that back to him, because what I am saying is that it's more complicated than you'd think and the science backs that up.

 

[SamboPunch]

that last chick absolutely wrecked him

 

[SamboPunch]

the fuck, she tries to get up and walk away and he squeezes her hand more and she has to tell him to let go.... anyone notice that? dude is creepy.

 

[jojoRed]

crowder rekt by some random kid.

He didnt get rekt in the slightest, explain?

 

[West Linn]

That's not a female, that's a tranny you fuckin asshole.

 

[SKITZADACTYL]

Stephen Crowder doesn't know he's dealing with the best stroiker in the hewl of the ufc.

stleykeh**

 

[SKITZADACTYL]

i don't see any resemblance at all though.

 

[fractal]

Why is Darren Till in a stroller?

 

[City_Lights]

Well this is a stupid thread but on topic (sort of) I saw a picture of a young Faye Dunaway this morning and thought she looked a lot like Ronda Rousey but didn't feel like making a thread about it,so i'll post it here.

Maybe it's because I'm familiar with Faye Dunaway but I'm not seeing it.

 

[Verace]

Thats not a female TS

You fell into the trap lol

 

[Vil7]

Well this is a stupid thread but on topic (sort of) I saw a picture of a young Faye Dunaway this morning and thought she looked a lot like Ronda Rousey but didn't feel like making a thread about it,so i'll post it here.

Too thin, cheekbones too nice, no basketball head.

 

[Threetrees]

Lol... Crowder rustling the Jimmies itt. He can be a little obnoxious at times, but he also makes some good points. At least he is open to have a discussion and doesn't try and talk over the people he disagrees with.

He doesnt make good points and he makes conservatives look stupid.

 

[Fungoose]

I think you're being a bit naive. While it's true he's not shouting over someone, he's using a very different but equally obvious tactic. First of all he is not disagreeing with an opinion someone has, he is disagreeing with the basis of their identity and human experience. However polite, that is rough to deal with without getting emotional.

He is knowingly attempting to be deceitful. Trying to play the nice guy, but hand picking "studies" and misrepresenting facts. Notice how he's switching between a biological argument and then going straight to solipsism, nevermind that studies show there is in fact biological differences that pertains to the way we view gender and sexual identify.

When he asked "How do you know you were born trans?" and the guest applies "How do you know you were born heterosexual?", he had an answer obviously being that he has male hormones and like women (which is very simplified and may not be entirely true, but that's another thing). What she should have asked would be "Why do you like certain type of features in women, over others? Why do you like the color green more than blue?" to make him consider why that is.

I'm not saying that liking a certain color or liking redheads is the same as being attrackted to the same sex or identifying as another gender. He was trying to paint her as a solipsist without reason, or more bluntly put, a nutcase. She should throw that back to him, because what I am saying is that it's more complicated than you'd think and the science backs that up.

The part that gets me was him harping on the male and female brain part like it was some gotcha moment. They were just referencing a typecast, the archetype of a standard male or female brain. This was an attention grab disguised as polite discourse, regardless of personal beliefs.

 

[Sano]

The part that gets me was him harping on the male and female brain part like it was some gotcha moment. They were just referencing a typecast, the archetype of a standard male or female brain. This was an attention grab disguised as polite discourse, regardless of personal beliefs.

I like how he goes "stop being impolite" when someone interrupts him, but that's after he's basicly called them insane and talked about how likely it is they will kill themselves or discussed their sexual organs in detail, completely dismissing their life experiences. Trying to force them into corners by using sleasy debate tactics and deliberately trying to find weak spots in their emotional state, when he is losing the argument. That's not impolite no.

The hypocrisy! It's so obviously on purpose. The sad thing is that his fans just don't see it. They are so enthralled in their "us vs them" political narrative and "SJWS!!!!" bullshit divide that they can't think critically.

 

[Mmaprovost]

crowder rekt by some random kid.

That kid's argument was legit. He was constantly interrupted and not allowed to go into detail though.

There are people in everyday life who identify as Republican or Democrat, Conservative or Liberal, Left or Right from a moral standpoint. Those in "power" identify as such merely for votes. They are all thief's interested in advancing their own well being.

Kid is so close to true Anarchism if he just realizes that Socialism isn't possible due to human nature.

 

[Steve-French]

He doesnt make good points and he makes conservatives look stupid.

I'm not a conservative, and I don't agree with everything he says, but he is a comedian and I agree on his stances against Antifa, SJWs, Islam, and PC culture.