Crime FBI Raid Home Of Whistleblower in Hillary Clinton's Uranium One Scandal, Ignore Protection Laws

Lol at this paraonia of Russia. The left hates Russia the same reason they hate Israel. They are woke on multiculturalism and scumbag liberal gay and trany and race denying BS. Not to mention they oppose open borders. If this was trudeaus government allegedly interfering legally or with facebook bots or if it was Macron or merkel you would be praising them.
Russia and Israel are evil agents of Satan. Trannys deserved to be free and happy just like all sentient beings do. Both race and gender are illusions. Open borders are justified because God did not put man here so anyone group of people's can keep a citizen of the earth from going where he pleases. Gaia is a gift to all living life forms. Trudeau and Macron are good men. All this will come to past in Master Soros life time.

Namaste
 
Last edited:
Yes. I work in the government and commercial nuclear industry, including Y12 and Pantex. Executives, Scientists, Nuclear Engineers, are all still stunned at the Uranium 1 deal. Uranium domestically is in short supply enough for the U.S.A. and handing over 20% to Russians is ridiculous. The money the Clintons made right behind it from Russians is ridiculous. Having a Whistleblower raided is ridiculously sketchy. Why wasn't Hillary ever raided for her servers, devices, laptops? She had actual Top Secret and SAP material on her items and NOTHING happened.

I need to review Uranium One again.

From what I recall even from the last few days and Dan Bongino's speech on Nov 18th, was that basically under Obama's admin with Hillary as SOS, intel was intercepted on Iran's working with the Russians on a nuclear deal. The Obama/Hillary admin worked out a deal so that Russia got 20% of US' Uranium production, a part of which was heading to Iran. Out if this deal, large kickbacks went to Hillary's and Bill's Clinton Foundation. Just typying that out, wow.
 
Last edited:
A judge signed a search warrant because there was probable cause for a search to be conducted!

Okay, that is technically part of the chain of events, but it is also part of the unanswered "why" this warrant was granted. Did the judge know all of the details and/or was the judge misled in any way.
 
@hillelslovak87 @JDragon

Even if there is nothing here about Uranium One, it bears investigation as to why this event occurred. The Whistleblower followed protocol, submitted the "evidence" to the IG, who in turn followed protocol by submitting it to the House Intelligence committee.

If the FBI did nothing wrong, it is simply a checks and balance practice that shouldn't be frowned upon by anyone. The FBI should be kept in check, particularly where a necessary protection appears to be breached (at least on the surface by many).

This is a ploy. You act as if you want transparency, yet betray your charge. It's amazing you want checks and balances in defense of the president.....

Does NOT matter that...

1. Clinton as Secretary of State did NOTHING to Russia for invading Crimea.
2. Clinton is a Socialist like Russia is. (while Trump is the poster boy for Capitalism)
3. The DNC, Clinton Campaign colluded with the media against Bernie Sanders.
4. Millions of dollars was donated to the Clinton Foundation by Russians.
5. For some reason she wanted Russia to get our Uranium (while publicly stating Russia is one of the biggest threats to America!)

But...doesnt matter. Orange man bad. He beyond a doubt colluded with Russia even though its been 2 years with NO proof and makes no sense.

1. It was not up to Clinton as to what action to take against Russia. (This is odd, I thought Hil-dawg was going to confront Russia and start WW3)

2. Clinton is such a socialist that people on both sides had legit complaints about her wall street and big business ties. Such socialist!!

3. I don't know about collusion with "the media", but yes, the DNC and it's heads should be censured and removed from any and all positions they hold. It was corruption of the democratic process.

4. From what I have seen, Russian actors helped Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders in an effort to hurt Clinton. Having said that, if Hilary did in fact take money from a hostile entity, prosecute everyone involved. Pushing at an open door.

5. You don't seem to know anything about the Uranium One deal.

Why do you keep loading your diapers about "NOTHING PROVEN!! NO COLLUSION!!" in an ongoing case in which the investigators have not leaked? Such odd, servile behavior towards an old fat man in an ill fitting suit.
 
None of this matters. We all know (or should by now) that there two seperate sets of rules for the plebes and the scum that run in high circles.
Justice is "just for us", not them. At most, we'll get the usual dog and pony show placebo until the next manufactured outrage. Thank god for short attention spans, amirite?
 
1. It was not up to Clinton as to what action to take against Russia. (This is odd, I thought Hil-dawg was going to confront Russia and start WW3)

2. Clinton is such a socialist that people on both sides had legit complaints about her wall street and big business ties. Such socialist!!

3. I don't know about collusion with "the media", but yes, the DNC and it's heads should be censured and removed from any and all positions they hold. It was corruption of the democratic process.

4. From what I have seen, Russian actors helped Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders in an effort to hurt Clinton. Having said that, if Hilary did in fact take money from a hostile entity, prosecute everyone involved. Pushing at an open door.

5. You don't seem to know anything about the Uranium One deal.

1. SECRETARY OF STATE. Do you even know what this job entails? Under Bush, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice were instrumental in the direction actions were taken on foreign governments. Now you are left to decide, was Obama a SHIT President that ignored Clinton...or was Clinton SHIT at doing her job?

Have fun though im sure you will ignore this part of the post.


2. Did you just attempt to make it sound that Clinton does not push socialist ideals? LMMFAO...

3. Excuse me? DNC hack...the thing that HAPPENED...all released to the PUBLIC...caused 13 people in the DNC to step DOWN...Debby Shitz being the #1 culprit and being rewarded the NEXT DAY with a position on the Clinton campaign and being handed a Senate seat out of the blue.

4. Russian actors...

5. You seem brainwashed.
 
This is a ploy. You act as if you want transparency, yet betray your charge. It's amazing you want checks and balances in defense of the president.....

All I'm asking for is a simple answer.

Was your simple answer "this is a ploy" Are are you charging my question as a ploy?
 
Cliffs: This appears to be a classic case of whistleblower retaliation by the FBI that occurred on Nov. 19th/2018.

- The whistleblower gave the DOJ Inspector General (Michael Horowitz) evidence against the Clinton Foundation to do with Uranium One. The DOJ Inspector's job is to find wrong-doing in the FBI.

- 16 FBI agents raid the home of Dennis Cain on Nov. 19th/2018, spend about 6 hours there. Cain is forthright with the copied evidence he has and hands it over. They still search his house.

- Whistleblowers are supposed to be protected by the government when they hand over information. They have protected status under the law.

Senator Grassley brought up several questions with regard to this FBI agent raid:

1. Why was Cain's house raided?
2. Did the FBI know about Cain's discovery?
3. Are the documents considered protected?
4. Did the FBI seize any classified information?

Analyst Luke Rosiak concludes wrong-doing on multiple accounts. The raid implies that a) that the Clintons violated the law in relation to their foundation and Uranium One, b) the FBI knew about that, or at least had strong evidence of illegality and didn't act on it, c) Robert Mueller was head of the FBI at the time this occurred which suggest bias now in his current role as special counsel, and d) the strong action taken on the Whistleblower, or the cover-up of the cover-up (no word on why they searched his house and didn't arrest him after already accepting the copy of what was turned over to Michael Horowitz). Luke further concludes that Mueller really now has to make this stuff go away because it shows the FBI didn't act on known Clinton information before.

People on both the right and the left are concerned today (yesterday the 6th) about the FBI's abuse of authority and clear Whistleblower retaliation.

- The judge in this case hasn't disclosed the warrant, so it's unknown if the FBI told the judge if they knew this guy was a protected Whistleblower, or was it a similar situation to the misleading of the FISA court to obtain the warrant against Trump.

- This Whistleblower DID follow the proper procedure in handing over the information to the Inspector General of the DOJ, Michael Horowitz, who then turned this information over to the House Intelligence committee and the Senate.

Clarifying concern of Mueller's complicit part in this all, is, what if Clinton campaign illegality is getting so difficult to further cover up (now, particularly with these new Whistleblower documents that were released to Republicans and Democrats alike), that Bob has to send an FBI raid to cleanup further.

Finally, the analyst and hostess agree, that these Uranium One documents should likely be released to the public.



https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/fbi-whistleblower-clinton-uranium/

BTW, in the first couple of pages of Google search results, not one link to CNN, MSNBC, ABC or any other mainstream media source outside of FOX. This clearly shows MSM bias.

*edit - further info from dailycaller link:

"FBI agents raided the home of a recognized Department of Justice whistleblower who privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.

“The bureau raided my client to seize what he legally gave Congress about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One,” the whistleblower’s lawyer, Michael Socarras, told TheDCNF, noting that he considered the FBI’s raid to be an “outrageous disregard” of whistleblower protections. (RELATED: FBI Takes Aim At The Clinton Foundation)

Sixteen agents arrived at the home of Dennis Nathan Cain, a former FBI contractor, on the morning of Nov. 19 and raided his Union Bridge, Maryland, home, Socarras told TheDCNF.

The raid was permitted by a court order signed on Nov. 15 by federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher in the U.S. District Court for Baltimore and obtained by TheDCNF.

A special agent from the FBI’s Baltimore division, who led the raid, charged that Cain possessed stolen federal property and demanded entry to his private residence, Socarras told TheDCNF.

“On Nov. 19, the FBI conducted court authorized law enforcement activity in the Union Bridge, Maryland area,” bureau spokesman Dave Fitz told TheDCNF. “At this time, we have no further comment.”

Cain informed the agent while he was still at the door that he was a recognized protected whistleblower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act and that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized his whistleblower status, according to Socarras.

Cain further told the FBI agent the potentially damaging classified information had been properly transmitted to the Senate and House Intelligence committees as permitted under the act, Socarras said. The agent immediately directed his agents to begin a sweep of the suburban home, anyway.

Frightened and intimidated, Cain promptly handed over the documents, Socarras told TheDCNF. Yet even after surrendering the information to the FBI, the agents continued to rummage through the home for six hours.

“After asking and getting my approval to do so, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had a member of his staff physically take Mr. Cain’s classified document disclosure to the House and Senate Intelligence committees,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

“For the bureau to show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistleblower who gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law,” he continued.

Cain came across the potentially explosive information while working for an FBI contractor, Socarras told TheDCNF."

>
"The two law enforcement officials directed the documents be sent to the Senate and House Intelligence committees for their examination, according to Socarras, who said that a high-level IG official hand-delivered the documents to the the two intelligence committees.

“I cannot believe the Bureau informed the federal magistrate who approved the search warrant that they wanted to search the home of an FBI whistleblower to seize the information that he confidentially disclosed to the IG and Congress,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

The whistleblower act is intended to protect whistleblowers within the intelligence community, which includes the FBI.

“The [intelligence community] is committed to providing its personnel the means to report violations of law,” according to a 2016 intelligence community directive.

“The [whistleblower act] authorizes employees of contractors to take government property and give it to the two intelligence committees confidentially,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

The FBI has yet to talk to Cain’s attorney despite the raid, according to Socarras.

“After the raid, and having received my name and phone number from Mr. Cain as his lawyer, an FBI agent actually called my client directly to discuss his seized electronics,” Socarras told TheDCNF. “Knowingly bypassing the lawyer of a represented client is serious misconduct.”

The Justice Department and the IG both declined to comment."



Is this it? Is this the one that poves deep state reptilians rule the world?

Fake news.... sad...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why isn't Trump preventing these actions against whistleblowers?
 
1. SECRETARY OF STATE. Do you even know what this job entails? Under Bush, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice were instrumental in the direction actions were taken on foreign governments. Now you are left to decide, was Obama a SHIT President that ignored Clinton...or was Clinton SHIT at doing her job?

Have fun though im sure you will ignore this part of the post.


2. Did you just attempt to make it sound that Clinton does not push socialist ideals? LMMFAO...

3. Excuse me? DNC hack...the thing that HAPPENED...all released to the PUBLIC...caused 13 people in the DNC to step DOWN...Debby Shitz being the #1 culprit and being rewarded the NEXT DAY with a position on the Clinton campaign and being handed a Senate seat out of the blue.

4. Russian actors...

5. You seem brainwashed.

1. Once again, Hilary Clinton does not have final say on deals that involve multiple agencies, and must be signed by the president, which, as you might know, she has never been. She lost, get over it.

2. Clinton is an old guard hawk with deep ties across the big business world, particularly in central banking. Good one!!!

3. Do you view me as being a supporter of the DNC? It seems you are grasping for the knob of a door already open.....

4. You apparently don't know what the term "actors" means in a political sense.

5. You ignore the actual details of the deal in the pretense of asserting Hilary Clinton was responsible for the deal, which did not even do what your sources are intimating happened. Even uncle Shep had to quell this bullshit multiple times, but it seems as if you guys were unable or unwilling to listen.

 
Why isn't Trump preventing these actions against whistleblowers?

I think this came out after the raid took place as far as I can tell. I doubt Trump had prior knowledge that this was going to take place. He's been pretty open that he thinks the FBI has already rogue entities (not the least of which is Rosenstein and his Mueller special counsel).

I think he's allowing the DOJ and House Intel committee to do it's job, which is what appears to be happening in this case.
 
I need to review Uranium One again.

From what I recall even from the last few days and Dan Bongino's speech on Nov 18th, was that basically under Obama's admin with Hillary as SOS, intel was intercepted on Iran's working with the Russians on a nuclear deal. The Obama/Hillary admin worked out a deal so that Russia got 20% of US' Uranium production, a part of which was heading to Iran. Out if this deal, large kickbacks went to Hillary's and Bill's Clinton Foundation. Just typying that out, wow.

That's not even close to how it happened. It was a Canadian owned company and Russia already owned a small share in it.
 
1. Once again, Hilary Clinton does not have final say on deals that involve multiple agencies, and must be signed by the president, which, as you might know, she has never been. She lost, get over it.

2. Clinton is an old guard hawk with deep ties across the big business world, particularly in central banking. Good one!!!

3. Do you view me as being a supporter of the DNC? It seems you are grasping for the knob of a door already open.....

4. You apparently don't know what the term "actors" means in a political sense.

5. You ignore the actual details of the deal in the pretense of asserting Hilary Clinton was responsible for the deal, which did not even do what your sources are intimating happened. Even uncle Shep had to quell this bullshit multiple times, but it seems as if you guys were unable or unwilling to listen.



Sheperd Smith is willfully blind progressive Democrat. Further to this, he was equating Foxnews to Judge Neopolitano who very well could have had his own sources.

I think you need to go back through the details of the Dan Bongino thread from yesterday. The three spoiler time-segments starting at 11:04. It'll take you just a few minutes to read through.
 
1. Once again, Hilary Clinton does not have final say on deals that involve multiple agencies, and must be signed by the president, which, as you might know, she has never been. She lost, get over it.

Because you suck so much ass for ignoring the part I said you WOULD IGNORE because it would show how much of a shitheel you are about this I am only going to address the first part of your shitty point of view.

So long Clinton whore as Powell's Security Coucil presentation was the final nail in the coffin of there NOT being war in Iraq.
 
That's not even close to how it happened. It was a Canadian owned company and Russia already owned a small share in it.

What are you talking about? Lol, Canadian ownership is a really small detail of this.

The reality, which Google buries several pages deep, is laid out well by Politico:

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895

"The deal in question involves the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the company. In 2013, a third transaction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium One.

With its purchase of Uranium One, Rosatom assumed control of roughly 20 percent of uranium production capacity in the U.S. The current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium outside the country, according to OilPrice.com.

Because uranium is considered an asset with national security implications, the 2010 sale to Rosatom was subject to approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, an intragovernmental agency that includes input from the Departments of State, Treasury, Justice, Energy, Defense, Commerce and Homeland Security, as well as the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

What are the allegations of wrongdoing?

Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium One’s owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her family’s charity.

Connections between Clinton Foundation donors and Uranium One were first published in 2015 by The New York Times, which based its reporting in part on the book “Clinton Cash,” by Breitbart News senior editor-at-large Peter Schweizer.

The allegations resurfaced last October, when The Hill reported that the FBI was investigating Kremlin “bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States.

Trump and his allies have been especially vocal in their calls for a Uranium One investigation in response to news regarding special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and allegations that individuals with ties to Trump or his campaign may have colluded with the Kremlin in those efforts.

What about a special prosecutor?

Some Trump supporters have called on the Justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the deal, a step that Attorney General Jeff Sessions appears to be entertaining. In a letter sent Monday to House Republicans, one of Sessions’ top deputies said the attorney general had directed federal prosecutors to look into certain issues, among them the Uranium One deal and the Clinton Foundation.

Those prosecutors, the letter said, “will report directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General, as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”

At a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sessions pushed back on questioning about why the DOJ has not more aggressively pursued a Uranium One investigation, saying, "'Looks like' is not enough basis to appoint a special counsel.”

A DOJ spokesman, however, clarified that Sessions was not taking sides on GOP lawmakers' monthslong call for a special counsel to investigate Clinton."

>

Bottom line is the Clinton Foundation received a donation (s) totalling about $145 million from Uranium One owners after the deal finalization took place.

Further to this, part of the Uranium One agreement was that no Uranium would leave Russia. If, in fact, some US Uranium was being funneled through this company (in breach of the agreement) with Obama admin's knowledge, then this is certainly worth investigating.

Why wouldn't there be a formal investigation into possible Clinton wrong-doing, and the associated stone-turning (witch hunt) that Mueller is conducting, instead, on the Trump campaign and admin?

In light of this thread, a full 16 person FBI sweep of a Whistleblower's home seems newsworthy to me. And, it points to possible corruption within the FBI.
 
Last edited:
There was no whining in that at all, just an honest appraisal of how it will likely unfold as well as a statement on how current political items will likely unfold as well. Did my predictions hurt your feelings?
 
Because you suck so much ass for ignoring the part I said you WOULD IGNORE because it would show how much of a shitheel you are about this I am only going to address the first part of your shitty point of view.

So long Clinton whore as Powell's Security Coucil presentation was the final nail in the coffin of there NOT being war in Iraq.


I made my position known. No matter how much you protest, Hilary Clinton was never in fact president of the USA. No matter how much sway she had, despite being one of like a dozen people involved, mostly agency heads, in the approval, she did not have final say. I addressed your clearly, despite your unwillingness or inability to comprehend what I wrote.

Your last poorly worded insult and statement are baffling. Please untangle that word soup in a more coherent fashion, because it makes no sense.
 
Back
Top