The tap has long since dried up...
They got their investigations and surveillance warrants, so... where's the smoking gun from those? Why aren't they releasing a recorded conversation between Trump and Putin right after he won the election, proudly, egotistically reporting his success to his alleged puppetmaster at a time he wouldn't even know he was being surveilled? I couldn't care less about something that could've been fabricated by a teenager at 4chan; people want indisputable, concrete evidence and nothing less from claims of this magnitude. Enough with the petty insinuation and guilt by association that don't amount to anything.
Why is it that Trump's 'Obama wiretapped me' claims made only a month ago has turned out to be more fruitful than the Russian allegations that has been going on for several months with far more effort and manpower put towards it? Because one of them actually happened and some evidence cannot be hidden to prove it existed; that's the difference between something that's real and something that's made up. The irony is that Comey has been far more supportive in his statements of the narrative that has produced less substantial evidence even going as far as borderline lying. Why? Could it be that the FBI was complicit in that surveillance of Trump, and they would only be making themselves look bad by pursuing it earnestly?
Even if the CIA used their cyber-powers to conjure up a conversation with the Kremlin to frame Trump or his team with, at this point it's too late. They lost their credibility after Wikileaks' Vault7 leaks, if they did it earlier before he got into power, it could've had their intended consequence (if Trump used email, they probably would've). But now they've past the saturation point; the more they bring the narrative up, the less credibility it has, and only prove it to be more of a political witch-hunt. They blew it.
