We've been playing Global sheriff for so long we've painted ourselves into a corner.
Member when you gullibles tried this after Ghouta?
I do. It was fucking delicious.
that is super flimsy argument, sorry. kill some people that might inconvenience him? why not just shoot them? why use a weapon that would instantly generate worldwide condemnation and close negotiation channels?What he gains is eliminating people that will give him trouble in the future just as they have in the past. And he has done it before and gotten away with it.
Up to this point Trump has said he would stay out of it and even with the use of gas Assad most likely thought Trump would do nothing.
So most likely it was him or one of his people that said to use it.
But I still see no reason it needs to be our job to step in.
Do you even know the handle (i.e. internet name) of the most trusted independent monitor of munitions used in this region? Because even after I told the guys dumb enough to deny Human Rights Watch and the UN in Ghouta who it was, and he backed them up, your ilk still denied it.I'm not sure why you think this is some kind of game that you personally can win or lose, but I'm genuinely asking for evidence.
By your very vague post it's hard to tell what you're thinking, but Ghouta is another chemical attack in which there is no evidence as to who exactly carried it out.
So again I'm asking, is there any evidence Assad was behind these chemical attacks? That goes for Ghouta as well
Seewudimeanvern?Nothing was concluded about Ghouta. What are you talking about?
So none then huh?
what is known? What is the evidence you speak of?
Regardless of how those countries may feel about our involvement with them, it's more about whether it's actually worth it anymore. Financially, politically, socially...The world generally would like us to stop sticking our noses into their business and Americans are increasingly feeling the same.Yes all those students in Chile were so lucky the US came to rescue them and install a dictator. I'm sure the citizens of Iran, Nicaragua, Guatemala etc. are also so grateful for the US looking out for their interests.
that is super flimsy argument, sorry. kill some people that might inconvenience him? why not just shoot them? why use a weapon that would instantly generate worldwide condemnation and close negotiation channels?
I'm not sure why you think this is some kind of game that you personally can win or lose, but I'm genuinely asking for evidence.
By your very vague post it's hard to tell what you're thinking, but Ghouta is another chemical attack in which there is no evidence as to who exactly carried it out.
So again I'm asking, is there any evidence Assad was behind these chemical attacks? That goes for Ghouta as well
my money's on rogue elements from Assad's military that might conveniently end up on the post-assad government. certain it wasn't him. gut feeling and over 10 years experience in sifting through political bullshit.Well it would seem all the right people are convinced he was behind it including the media.
So who do you say it was and what proof do you have?
How would Americans feel if China carried out a coup and put a President / dictator in power for Chinese interests? They'd probably be moaning about it for decades!Regardless of how those countries may feel about our involvement with them, .
So not about being Sheriff then. Shame about the vast numbers of people that were tortured and killed as a result, was it ever worth it then?it's more about whether it's actually worth it anymore. Financially, politically, socially..
The fuck do you expect? They're in a war zone- do you think they could just run to CBRN Depot down by Starbucks and pick up all the shit they need? No, they had to grab the hose and try to save the kids.There is none.
The "White Helmets" werent even wearing gloves (a must while handling chemical agents) while handling the "victims".
What he gains is eliminating people that will give him trouble in the future just as they have in the past. And he has done it before and gotten away with it.
Up to this point Trump has said he would stay out of it and even with the use of gas Assad most likely thought Trump would do nothing.
So most likely it was him or one of his people that said to use it.
But I still see no reason it needs to be our job to step in.
You have to be extremely dumb to say this to me within the context of this thread.You Trump spinsters are really getting sad.
So no evidence then?Do you even know the handle (i.e. internet name) of the most trusted independent monitor of munitions used in this region? Because even after I told the guys dumb enough to deny Human Rights Watch and the UN in Ghouta who it was, and he backed them up, your ilk still denied it.
What's my point? My point is I'm not keen running around collecting something that you don't actually believe in. Now tell me the name or brass off.
Seewudimeanvern?
You first.So no evidence then?
You first.