Evidence for theory of Evolution V2

[TheComebackKid]

I wonder why TS stopped replying to this thread. He had such great arguments, and showed such a willingness to engage in honest and rational debate.....

What is there to respond to? All you guys are doing is circle jerking about how true you think it is. No one is making an actual argument for one to respond to.

 

[TheComebackKid]

People: unfounded assertions based on wild speculation and tons of emotion.

Him: Its not real guys for a multitude of reasons. Here are the million holes in your theory.

Peoole:

Him:

Thats about it.

Fixed

 

[hillelslovak87]

What is there to respond to? All you guys are doing is circle jerking about how true you think it is. No one is making an actual argument for one to respond to.

Bro, he had been provided with dozens upon dozens of articles, studies, and presentations, even those geared at children, showing clear proof. He neglected to actually read any of it, save one paragraph from an article he thought disproved the article, showing he had not read the rest of the article. He dismissed everything else, while showing his ignorance, Michael Behe style. Shit is pathetic.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Bro, he had been provided with dozens upon dozens of articles, studies, and presentations, even those geared at children, showing clear proof. He neglected to actually read any of it, save one paragraph from an article he thought disproved the article, showing he had not read the rest of the article. He dismissed everything else, while showing his ignorance, Michael Behe style. Shit is pathetic.

Well actually the reason TS stopped responding to the thread is that he was reply banned by Limbo Pete because you evolutionists are thin skinned religious fanatics that get emotional and offended when they encounter unbelievers.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Well actually the reason TS stopped responding to the thread is that he was reply banned by Limbo Pete because you evolutionists are thin skinned religious fanatics that get emotional and offended when they encounter unbelievers.

Facts and studies are not creeds or dogmas. Push your "Science as a religion" horseshit elsewhere. Nobody here will fall for it.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Facts and studies are not creeds or dogmas. Push your "Science as a religion" horseshit elsewhere. Nobody here will fall for it.

Studies and subjective conclusions =/= facts. Science is not religion...but then again (macro) Evolution is not Science(in the sense that it's ever been demonstrated or observed). It is a theory that has taken on religious devotion by you guys.

Of course none of that precludes (macro) Evolution to be true. But if you can't acknowledge that it might not be true and that it is not established or proven as fact then there really is no debate to be had. It's like trying to argue with your average Christian about whether or not the Bible is true.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Studies and subjective conclusions =/= facts. Science is not religion...but then again (macro) Evolution is not Science(in the sense that it's ever been demonstrated or observed). It is a theory that has taken on religious devotion by you guys.

Of course none of that precludes (macro) Evolution to be true. But if you can't acknowledge that it might not be true and that it is not established or proven as fact then there really is no debate to be had. It's like trying to argue with your average Christian about whether or not the Bible is true.

Please qualify what macro evolution means to you. I hear lots of theists throw the term around, and rarely demonstrate a knowledge of what they are talking about.

Your last sentence is exemplary of a fundamental misunderstanding of the differences between science, history and math contrasted with religion. I feel dumber reading it.

 

[ShadBo]

Studies and subjective conclusions =/= facts. Science is not religion...but then again (macro) Evolution is not Science(in the sense that it's ever been demonstrated or observed). It is a theory that has taken on religious devotion by you guys.

Of course none of that precludes (macro) Evolution to be true. But if you can't acknowledge that it might not be true and that it is not established or proven as fact then there really is no debate to be had. It's like trying to argue with your average Christian about whether or not the Bible is true.

Dude, it is time for you to develop some new material.

For the love of god, man. Shit's weak.

 

[ShadBo]

This conversation between Aron Ra and War Room Creationist favorite Kent Hovind goes exactly as expected.

Just like in this thread, the Creationist wants to argue against his own made up definitions, refuses to answer simple yes or no questions, and continues to repeat total bullshit even after being corrected several times over and over. The part where Kent tries to assert ToE claims we all came from rocks is especially hilarious.

It's a two hour video, but I highly recommend you sit down with a fat joint or a pint of stout and enjoy the absolute zuluing that Aron lays on Kent.

 

[TheTimeIsNotNow]