So anders had a fairly solid win this past weekend over this Perez character. One judge had it 30-26 while the other two had it 30-25 and 29-28 . All three of those scores are pretty drastically different from one another including the 30 26/ 30 25 scorecards. Those are some pretty significant differences in opinion on judging the fight. Have the new rules allowed for even more inconsistent decisions and will it negatively impact future scorecards? I think most fans including myself were excited that more 10 - 8 rounds and 10 -7 rounds were going to be handed out ,as well as agreeing with the new judging criteria ,but seeing a score card like that can't help but make me feel a little concerned going into the future. Obviously this fight it didn't matter it was a dominant decision, but based purely on the points it looks concerning for more subjective fights. What's your take on this ? Just weird judging ? A problem with the new judging criteria?