- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 47,435
- Reaction score
- 20,857
I'm not going to write on all of it. Some of it makes sense, some of it makes sense but I don't think the government should interfere. Some of it I don't agree with at all.
But the 75% of shareholders and 75% of board members for political action is probably the one I can most easily support. I think that's consistent with current jurisprudence. The corporation's independent political spending are protected speech and the shareholders, as the people who own the corporation, should have some say in the political speech being assigned to them.
But the 75% of shareholders and 75% of board members for political action is probably the one I can most easily support. I think that's consistent with current jurisprudence. The corporation's independent political spending are protected speech and the shareholders, as the people who own the corporation, should have some say in the political speech being assigned to them.