Ecuador To Hand Over Assange To UK

tenor.gif
Again, you're just complaining that Wikileaks exposed the American people to information we should have already known anyways.

That's a friend to the American people, not an enemy.

The DNC shouldn't have been the lying, cheating, scumbags that Wikileaks exposed them to be if they didn't want to face the consequences of cheating.

In regards to the opinions of members of President Trump's Administration in regards to Assange, nobody's perfect.
 
Poor Julian, he just stayed neutral and exposed corruption, not giving a single f about parties and team think. As soon as he went for Hillary tho, he alienated the sheep on both sides of the isles. He's one of the few good and brave men left in this world, and evidence how greatly the media can destroy anyone they want, even for simply having sex without a condom. It's also still shocking to me that where the LEAKS came from is important to so many and not what their content is.
 
On 20 August 2010, two women, a 26-year-old living in Enköping and a 31-year-old living in Stockholm,[6][7] jointly went to the Swedish police not seeking to bring charges against Assange but in order to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases after their separate sexual encounters with him.[8] The police told them that they could not simply tell Assange to take a test, but that their statements would be passed to the prosecutor.[9] Later that day, the duty prosecutor ordered the arrest of Julian Assange on the suspicion of rape and molestation.[10]

The next day, the case was transferred to Chefsåklagare (Chief Public Prosecutor) Eva Finné. In answer to questions surrounding the incidents, the following day, Finné declared, "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape". However, Karin Rosander from the Swedish Prosecution Authority, said Assange remained suspected of molestation. Police gave no further comment at the time, but continued the investigation.[11]


At worst he would be regarded as a "sexual molester", not a rapist. He did not forcefully have sex with anyone without their consent.
How can a sleeping person consent to intercourse?
 
How can a sleeping person consent to intercourse?

If the Swedish Chief Public Prosecutor says that there is no reason to suspect Assange for committing rape, then you probably better believe it.

Obviously the allegations probably didn't hold up in court. Considering Sweden's lowered definition of rape (compared to other countries), they could've easily prosecuted him for that, if he had committed any such wrong-doings. The fact that they dropped the "rape" angle completely, means that there was likely no evidence whatsoever that he was having sex without consent.
 
Poor Julian, he just stayed neutral and exposed corruption, not giving a single f about parties and team think. As soon as he went for Hillary tho, he alienated the sheep on both sides of the isles. He's one of the few good and brave men left in this world, and evidence how greatly the media can destroy anyone they want, even for simply having sex without a condom. It's also still shocking to me that where the LEAKS came from is important to so many and not what their content is.
It's not simply sex without a condom. He ejaculated inside women that specifically told him not to. One was asleep until she woke up with him penetrating her.
 
If the Swedish Chief Public Prosecutor says that there is no reason to suspect Assange for committing rape, then you probably better believe it.

Obviously the allegations probably didn't hold up in court. Considering Sweden's lowered definition of rape (compared to other countries), they could've easily prosecuted him for that, if he had committed any such wrong-doings. The fact that they dropped the "rape" angle completely, means that there was likely no evidence whatsoever that he was having sex without consent.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority

He was charged with rape. The investigation was stopped because he's been on the lam to avoid appearing in court. If he returns they will charge him.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority

He was charged with rape. The investigation was stopped because he's been on the lam to avoid appearing in court. If he returns they will charge him.

Did you read the article?

It says the charges of rape were dropped almost immediately by the prosecutor.

On 20 August 2010, two women, a 26-year-old living in Enköping and a 31-year-old living in Stockholm,[6][7] jointly went to the Swedish police not seeking to bring charges against Assange but in order to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases after their separate sexual encounters with him.[8] The police told them that they could not simply tell Assange to take a test, but that their statements would be passed to the prosecutor.[9] Later that day, the duty prosecutor ordered the arrest of Julian Assange on the suspicion of rape and molestation.[10]

The next day, the case was transferred to Chefsåklagare (Chief Public Prosecutor) Eva Finné. In answer to questions surrounding the incidents, the following day, Finné declared, "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape". However, Karin Rosander from the Swedish Prosecution Authority, said Assange remained suspected of molestation. Police gave no further comment at the time, but continued the investigation.[11]

After learning of the investigation, Assange said, "The charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing".[12]

The preliminary investigation concerning suspected rape was discontinued by Finné on 25 August,[10] but two days later Claes Borgström, the attorney representing the two women, requested a review of the prosecutor's decision to terminate part of the investigation.[10][13]

On 30 August, Assange was questioned by the Stockholm police regarding the allegations of sexual molestation.[14] He denied the allegations, saying he had consensual sexual encounters with the two women.[12][15][16]


Obviously the police themselves did not feel like the case matched up with (Sweden's extremely strict) definition of rape. So there's no real reason to continue on with the claims of Assange being a rapist. If you want to think of him as a womanizing perv, and a sexist pig, by all means. But he's not a rapist.
 
The migrant crisis will be ongoing through this century.

Africas population will double and hit 2.4 billion by 2050.

Europeans are being taxed to pay for Africans to come and live in their countries and outbreed them.

Brits are already an ethnic minority in London and Birmingham. Soon, there won't be enough white people to tax and too many takers. It is unsustainable ...

lol, it's not climate change. It's birth rates.

Lets be honest. It is not climate change, it is a planned genocide of white countries. It is blatant, an it is obvious.
 
Did you read the article?

It says the charges of rape were dropped almost immediately by the prosecutor.

On 20 August 2010, two women, a 26-year-old living in Enköping and a 31-year-old living in Stockholm,[6][7] jointly went to the Swedish police not seeking to bring charges against Assange but in order to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases after their separate sexual encounters with him.[8] The police told them that they could not simply tell Assange to take a test, but that their statements would be passed to the prosecutor.[9] Later that day, the duty prosecutor ordered the arrest of Julian Assange on the suspicion of rape and molestation.[10]

The next day, the case was transferred to Chefsåklagare (Chief Public Prosecutor) Eva Finné. In answer to questions surrounding the incidents, the following day, Finné declared, "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape". However, Karin Rosander from the Swedish Prosecution Authority, said Assange remained suspected of molestation. Police gave no further comment at the time, but continued the investigation.[11]

After learning of the investigation, Assange said, "The charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing".[12]

The preliminary investigation concerning suspected rape was discontinued by Finné on 25 August,[10] but two days later Claes Borgström, the attorney representing the two women, requested a review of the prosecutor's decision to terminate part of the investigation.[10][13]

On 30 August, Assange was questioned by the Stockholm police regarding the allegations of sexual molestation.[14] He denied the allegations, saying he had consensual sexual encounters with the two women.[12][15][16]


Obviously the police themselves did not feel like the case matched up with (Sweden's extremely strict) definition of rape. So there's no real reason to continue on with the claims of Assange being a rapist. If you want to think of him as a womanizing perv, and a sexist pig, by all means. But he's not a rapist.
What's the source? Wikipedia states the molestation charges were dropped when the statute of limitations expired except for the rape case. That investigation was stopped only last year but that he is still liable until the statute of limitations is reached in 2020.
 
You wouldnt hate him so if a certain % of media that is anti Trump didnt hate him.

Yes some right wingers are hypocrites for hating Assange during obama years and now liking hin. But now it has flipped. Left and some people who might of semi defended a whistleblower like Assange have turned because they believe some swedish guy is a Russian agent. Based on what? Why would he.

It has gotten so bad some posters in here like @JosephDredd go around calling me and anyone who says opposite view that we are Russian "spies or bots". its retarded and dangerous.

I've never called you a Russian Bot. I said that there were times your posting reminded me of a Russian bot.
 
I heard he's applying for asylum at the nearest Trump tower
 
BS, there is something called a trial in absentia.
Read the victim testimony and let me know if you think that's normal behavior. Aside from the "grab 'em by the pussy and they let you cause you're famous" defense, he purposely ejaculated inside these women, that despite their prostests. Would you be ok with a man treating your daughter that way?
 
Read the victim testimony and let me know if you think that's normal behavior. Aside from the "grab 'em by the pussy and they let you cause you're famous" defense, he purposely ejaculated inside these women, that despite their prostests. Would you be ok with a man treating your daughter that way?

If the whore was already sleeping in his bed, I would care less.

Lol @ millionaires trying to cum in women.
 
Dr. Paul ways in:
Wikileaks founder and chief editor Julian Assange has been in solitary confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy for more than six years. Though the original charges have been dropped against him, he remains in the Embassy for fear of being extradited to the US for prosecution. His "crime"? Publishing things the government does not want us to know.

It is past time for Assange to be freed.


 
I do hope he does some time at Her Majesties pleasure when ever he's finally pushed out of the embassy .
 
WikiLeaks Says it will Bring Hillary Clinton Down by October 21

President Donald Trump has one campaign yet to fulfill and WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange is vowing to see that one fulfilled sooner rather later. In his words – “If Trump doesn’t take Clinton down, we will.”

In a WikiLeaks letter he wrote:


Hillary Clinton’s crimes will not go unpunished. If she is not formally charged for mishandling sensitive material we will have no choice but to release proof that she is guilty of high treason against the United States for selling patented military secrets to the Saudi Arabian government.


We also have proof that she is guilty of crimes against Russia, Uzbekistan, Lithuania, Caledonia, and Brazil. The United States would be doing her a favor by putting her in prison and saving her from the severe punishments several of these nations would impose.


Assange showed his determination to see Clinton indicted by setting an October 21 deadline – indict her yourself or I will release irrefutable
proof that she has committed high treason....
 
Back
Top