Yeah you can't substitute complexity for depth, be it thematic, emotional or otherwise. I suppose I can still appreciate this as more a Charlize fan than a fan of the character.John Wick has a much simpler plot than Atomic Blonde but it [JW] was more engaging and I was more emotionally invested in the main character.
In the trailer I saw, she only did it once and the others were strikes to the thigh/leg/abdomen area I think. In the actual movie, the junk shots were minimal if I recall correctly.I was just wondering how much did she go after mens junk in the fights there was a trailer showing her shooting like 3 or 4 men in the dick who really fucking does that besides Butters.
My assumption is it's only relying on chopsocky action and very shit story and characters.
The Rock posted a video of her learning all her moves and kinda made me interested.
I dunno man. The only reason I watched Aeon Flux was Theron. I may watch Atomic Blonde and Theron is the #1 selling point to me. The style and action are the other two. I loved her in Mad Max, even though I didn't go to that for her, I was impressed. Oh, and I will likely never see Fate of the Furious.Hollywood thinks Charlize Theron is a hot property because Mad Max and Fate of the Furious both made shittons of money.
Apparently, no one told them that nobody went to see those movies for Charlize Theron.
Hopefully after this weekend, that point will be made clear.
I dunno man. The only reason I watched Aeon Flux was Theron. I may watch Atomic Blonde and Theron is the #1 selling point to me. The style and action are the other two. I loved her in Mad Max, even though I didn't go to that for her, I was impressed. Oh, and I will likely never see Fate of the Furious.
She's a great costar. But agreed on not being a big seller when leading. She is mega hot though so it sells with me hehe.http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0402022/
Aeon Flux bigly bombed.
She's a decent costar, but she's no leading lady.