Donald's $1.75 T Infrastructure Plan

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by luckyshot, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. luckyshot

    luckyshot VP of the ENTIRE WR

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    6,731
    Likes Received:
    16,961
    Location:
    Location, Location
    Want to "keep" the campaign promise to fix the infrastructure? Also want to cut federal taxes for the wealthy? How can it be done?

    Simple: make states pay.

    Such genius, so finance.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Details of the long awaited infrastructure plan are here.

    What does it boil down to? An unfunded mandate.

    https://www.npr.org/2018/02/11/5849...long-awaited-1-5-trillion-infrastructure-plan
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
  2. cincymma79

    cincymma79 Red Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    9,971
    Likes Received:
    6,001
    This is racist sexist and kkk
    Infrastructure is the worst idea ever this year, but not last year. Last year it was great.

    What we really need is another damned damn. Oooh ooh. Hear me out. Giant trench. We dig the rio out to be a mile wide and 500 feet deep. We have our own personal Panama Canal. And it’ll be a wall they can’t dig under.

    But seriously though the Brent Spence bridge every president does a speech in front of is still a pice of shit. I drove over it every day. Will his be the bill that fixes it finally
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
    ShadowRun likes this.
  3. BigDickRick

    BigDickRick Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    5,879
    Location:
    Getting taxed out my ass
    We are gonna spend our way out of this recession. Wait, that was like 10 years ago.

    We are going to spend our way right into a recession. And we may lack the monetary tools to help fix it when the recession does hit.
     
    IGIT, Strychnine, Pupi and 7 others like this.
  4. steveflynn

    steveflynn Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    18,813
    Likes Received:
    328
    Location:
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
    The Republican charade that they are the party of fiscal responsibility has finally, thankfully been shattered to pieces.
     
  5. uncommon

    uncommon Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,991
    Likes Received:
    3,442
    I think federal infrastructure spending is not likely to benefit rural towns. but they will still end up paying for them in some way.

    Am i wrong there?
     
  6. EZShrimpn

    EZShrimpn It, this is. Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2017
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Location:
    Washington D.C.
    This is all a giant plot by the right to get more high-speed internet access for rural people to shitpost on Sherdog.
     
    BudKing8806, sub_thug, Malvo and 6 others like this.
  7. BigDickRick

    BigDickRick Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    5,879
    Location:
    Getting taxed out my ass
    I’m not a fan of the feds spending trillions on infrastructure, particularly when the line of thinking is rooted in technology and ideas that are like 30-40years old. But it seems like the feds should have some soft of overbite because “infrastructure” is intertwined and should be continuous between states. Will the states cooperate and play nice with each other. Or try and bend each other over a barrel.
     
    Dr. Shoemaker and luckyshot like this.
  8. Quipling

    Quipling Red Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    13,986
    Location:
    purgatory
    What the fuck?

    Infrastructure is one of the few spending ideas that has bipartisan support.

    The biggest issue with this infrastructure plan is it's completely unfunded, making it useless.

    The second biggest issue is that when you spend money matters. Spending money on infrastructure during a recession does more for the economy than spending when unemployment is low. So yes, there's more support for infrastructure spending at some times.

    Maybe take the time to read posts instead of diving into your reflexive "reeee criticism!", scrat.
     
  9. luckyshot

    luckyshot VP of the ENTIRE WR

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    6,731
    Likes Received:
    16,961
    Location:
    Location, Location
    Highways are a big part of rural areas, seeing as they connect them to the rest of the world. Also, Trump's plan wouldn't change the taxes being paid; states would just have to bite the bullet (without the help of federal monies from things like corporate taxes).

    I think we both know the answer to that. See "right to work."
     
  10. method115

    method115 Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Messages:
    33,763
    Likes Received:
    11,745
    Living in Houston already feels like they are spending the money as it is. They've changed a lot of major highways here and are still making drastic changes near downtown.
     
  11. EZShrimpn

    EZShrimpn It, this is. Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2017
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Location:
    Washington D.C.
    I'm sure all the automated cars and trucks will appreciate having nice highways without potholes.
     
    Wall-E Brandao likes this.
  12. BigDickRick

    BigDickRick Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    5,879
    Location:
    Getting taxed out my ass
    High speed internet access should be apart of this infrastructure debate. Connectivity between cars, smart grids, traffic. Kinda what the EU has in mind.
     
  13. MMAViewer

    MMAViewer Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,509
    Likes Received:
    4,718
    Shouldn't the discussion be about how much we spend on infrastructure rather than if we should or shouldn't?
    Identity politics is crushing any cance for a constructive agenda. Pun intended!
     
    Malvo and MadSquabbles500 like this.
  14. TheComebackKid

    TheComebackKid Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    44,628
    Likes Received:
    15,372
    Nah forget that mess. We need l less connectivity and smart grids. We're setting ourselves up for disaster the way all this is heading.
     
  15. Falsedawn

    Falsedawn destroy Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,927
    Likes Received:
    31,003
    Location:
    El Kulum
    This retard finance shit is killing me. What a bunch of outright dipshits.
     
  16. Fanu

    Fanu Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Likes Received:
    2,458
  17. cincymma79

    cincymma79 Red Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    9,971
    Likes Received:
    6,001
    How did obama pay for his
     
  18. Fawlty

    Fawlty Raepublican

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2015
    Messages:
    24,712
    Likes Received:
    46,983
    Location:
    The CK Creamery
    All change starts at home, they say.
     
    Squarechoke, Pupi, Turtle Up and 8 others like this.
  19. uncommon

    uncommon Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,991
    Likes Received:
    3,442
    There is a should argument if its primarily benefitting city folk at the expense of rural towns.

    These massive non free market projects rarely get divvied up evenly.

    I think there could be alot of costs and benefits to it, historically would it be fair to say that federal infrastruture spending has been a success?

    would those variables hold true today?

    idk
     
    bufetadanacara likes this.
  20. luckyshot

    luckyshot VP of the ENTIRE WR

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    6,731
    Likes Received:
    16,961
    Location:
    Location, Location
    He couldn't because back then the GOP really, Really, REALLY cared about the deficit.

    See: "Rural Electrification Act of 1936"
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018

Share This Page