- Joined
- May 7, 2008
- Messages
- 20,162
- Reaction score
- 5
Then they need to make em cheaper and better.
Didn't they just discover that chemotherapy promotes the growth of other cancers in the body?
Anyways, i bet they're working hard on curing as many types of cancer as they can... and their distribution will be subscription-based.
I think somebody would have to be hopelessly goddamn gone to believe there's a conspiracy to not make a trillion dollars.
And anybody asking this question needs to march right the fuck down to his local community college and enroll in a biology class.
why do you think that getting an annual MRI would catch all cancer early?Why can't everyone get an annual MRI to catch cancer early?
this all hinges on a not super well accepted historical theory.I think the better question to ask would be, if a cure for cancer was found, would it be considered a disruptive technology?
If such a cure was found, what would be its impact on society? What would it mean for population growth? Resource management?
Would its impact be positive or negative?
The Black Plague was considered a terrible event in human history, but we can't deny that the evolution of our species benefited from it in the longrun. Its outbreak prevented Europe from reaching overpopulation like Asian lands, and it's survivors had a surplus of resources to live on.
The political structure changed as well, as a lot of the aristocracy passed away. It allowed for new leaders to emerge, with new ideas. The Renaissance was what followed. We explored new lands, discovered new cultures, expanded our empires.
If you could prevent the black plague knowing everything that followed in its wake, would it have been a wise move?
Exactly. If there was a cure, rich and powerful people would never die of cancer.If somebody like Steve Jobs couldn't get the "secret" cure for cancer, then nobody can.
What's the success rate of that?
i have never had anyone in my extended family ever have cancer and I only ever knew one person that has ever had it (a boy I was in boy scouts with 25 years ago). In the media they make it sound like cancer is running rampant everywhere. am I missing something? how is this possible?
I keep seeing people post about how there's too much money to be made from cancer that they are keeping the cure from going public. Do you believe this? There's been so much money and time poured into cancer research already.
And yet here's no promising cures for cancer anywhere in the near future. We've all been affected by it. Everyone has had someone go through cancer.
It's the number 2 cause of death by far and cancer rates are rising as quick as ever.i have never had anyone in my extended family ever have cancer and I only ever knew one person that has ever had it (a boy I was in boy scouts with 25 years ago). In the media they make it sound like cancer is running rampant everywhere. am I missing something? how is this possible?
That is terrible man.If true i wish him all the best.
Vice news did a piece on weaponized diseases genetically coded to only attack cancer almost 2 years ago. I can not find a update on the testing for this anywhere in the 2 years since.
And according to the alternative health community there are multiple, proven, known, virtually guaranteed cures for cancer.
Now, who's crazier...
Those who believe there is a cancer cure that's being kept from the public? Or those who believe there's a cure that's available to the public?
In all seriousness, my son has an inoperable brain tumor and beginning next week I am going to do a three month round of a high THC/CBD concentrate cannabis oil to see if we can shrink it.