The problem is you are attributing this to an inherent flaw in the style, which is false and its efficacy has been proven by mmaist utilizing the techniques even at a less proficient level.
Hey, that part i never stated that it's a fact, it's just my personal opinion, and i'm not exactly sure how that can piss you off so much, or any others members of this forum. What is this? No one can say anything negative towards the holy style of MT and Thais here? It's a sacrilege that i didn't know of?
I think every style has it flaws and low points, under a MMA ruleset i think MT isn't the best background you can have, you can disagree all you want and you don't have to answer if you feel irked about it, but it's my opinion, and while this thread was more of a jab at Coca, i'm not trolling.
And yes, you're right, MT it's something very effective to train for MMA fighters, it helps a lot of them to grow as fighters as
@Mafanofe posted above, i also acknowledged that here:
There's a few things like all the clinch fighting and elbow techniques that are very useful, that's something to absorb from MT, but IMO MT as a overall style it's not a good one, needs many adaptations to work in MMA.
Very often fights ends on the clinch with fighters repeatedly exchanging underhooks, and adding techniques from MT can be a great advantage there, many MMA fighters look lost on the clinch.
But, as your martial art background? Your first discipline? Not a good choice, FOR MMA. Again, my opinion, not painting it as a fact by any means. All subjective.
If you were fighting on the high lv scene in Thailand then, i already have a suspicious eye on how far you will go when following a fighter's transition, due to the previous failed attempts.