J
Julius_Caesar
Guest
Not just robberies but close fights the judges gave to the wrong fighter. Do you think the majority of fighters perform better or worse in a rematch after losing a controversial decision?
You go in there with a game plan, you do enough where you THINK you've won but the fight is given to your opponent. You watch the fight with your trainers afterwards confused as to how your opponent won. How do you think that effects the fighter and his team mentally? Wouldn't it make them change their game plans in the rematch which will make them go outside of what's natural to them and have them perform worse? And then there's also a chance of a controversial loss breaking the fighters spirit.
Yes I'm making this because of the Roman Gonzalez fight not to take anything away from either fighter. It just brought up this subject for me and reminded me of some other fights in the past.
To name a few examples:
Floyd vs Castillo
Ward vs Kovalev
Srisaket vs Roman
Feel free to add any others
You go in there with a game plan, you do enough where you THINK you've won but the fight is given to your opponent. You watch the fight with your trainers afterwards confused as to how your opponent won. How do you think that effects the fighter and his team mentally? Wouldn't it make them change their game plans in the rematch which will make them go outside of what's natural to them and have them perform worse? And then there's also a chance of a controversial loss breaking the fighters spirit.
Yes I'm making this because of the Roman Gonzalez fight not to take anything away from either fighter. It just brought up this subject for me and reminded me of some other fights in the past.
To name a few examples:
Floyd vs Castillo
Ward vs Kovalev
Srisaket vs Roman
Feel free to add any others