Yeah I agreed with you, your wording was just so confusing, I had to re-read what you were trying to say multiple times just to make sure.Exceptions to exceptions are not exceptions. It's not rocket science. It's like saying "on the other hand" twice, and either that motherfucker is Goro, or he's retarded
My bad, I'm super hopped up on cheetosYeah I agreed with you, your wording was just so confusing, I had to re-read what you were trying to say multiple times just to make sure.
...not the point kiddo.Yep, and he didn't deserve it
...not the point kiddo.
I am not one who would defend Dana, but pointing out he gave a second chance to Punk, however undeserving it is, proves Dana claiming "everybody deserves a second chance" to be true...
...if he was to bring Daley up, then he'd be right... but Punk just proved him wrong.
That's on you, not on me, kid.I didn't say that it was untrue that Dana claims "everybody deserves a second chance" so i don't know what you're on about
Lmao you quoted me first.That's on you, not on me, kid.
You are the one who interjected on my answer to someone else.
Next time pay attention to what is the context, so you don't make such asinine comment.
note: I am not bashing you, merely noting you are the one who quoted me on my answer... which was 100% correct.
Cm punk proves that saying wrong
er.... he had a second chance...
Yep, and he didn't deserve it
...not the point kiddo.
I am not one who would defend Dana, but pointing out he gave a second chance to Punk, however undeserving it is, proves Dana claiming "everybody deserves a second chance" to be true...
...if he was to bring Daley up, then he'd be right... but Punk just proved him wrong.
I didn't say that it was untrue that Dana claims "everybody deserves a second chance" so i don't know what you're on about
That's on you, not on me, kid.
You are the one who interjected on my answer to someone else.
Next time pay attention to what is the context, so you don't make such asinine comment.
note: I am not bashing you, merely noting you are the one who quoted me on my answer... which was 100% correct.
Kid, you prove yourself wrong.Lmao you quoted me first.
Getting off meds wasn't so good an idea afterall huh?
Don't bother quoting me with some meaningless 2deeo4u dribble cause here's the thread of replies
Kid, you prove yourself wrong.
I applaud the fact you defend yourself bravely, but alas, to a losing point.
He GAVE CM punk a second chance.
That proved his saying "anyone deserves a second chance" to be right.
I know your brain is slow and can't get around it, but he is actuallyh standing up to what he said (in this instance).
You are just too stupid to understand how wrong you are.
Again, kid.Wasn't i supposedly interjecting another conveersation? Where's the other person you supposedly quoted first?
Time to change the angles i guess.
I undertand you're shook so i'll give you one more chance
The saying that everybody deserves a second chance is wrong, since CM Punk got a second chance that he didn't deserve.
Again, kid.
He said it. There's no going back.
Using CM Punk as an example only proves what he said right, since he did give CM Punk a second chance.
There are no "different angles" to be had.
There's no need for "chances" since these two are facts.
Your opinion that CM Punk did NOT deserve a second chance is irrelevant.
If Dana gave him a second chance, then what he said ("Everyone deserves a second chance") applies here.
Go back to your basement and think it over, kid. It is not that hard.
Kid, you made an asinine point claiming what Dana said was wrong and gave the example of CM Punk..I've tried but there's really no hope for ya.
Don't @ me again