- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,531
- Reaction score
- 21,614
I assume you're too lazy to actually read the entire article then?
What? Based on me saying I hadn't read it? You've got some nerve.
I assume you're too lazy to actually read the entire article then?
Sherlock Holmes BTFO!!!What? Based on me saying I hadn't read it? You've got some nerve.
What should raise a red flag? That the court "assumed" that the allegations in the complaint were true at the dismissal stage? The court is obligated to do that on a motion to dismiss. It "assumes" arguendo that the allegations are true to determine whether, if true, the court would have jurisdiction. That doesn't mean or even indicate whether the allegations have any basis in fact.Which should raise a red flag smart one
While I think the DNC certainly made sure Hillary was going to win, the article is written in a poor manner which doesn't address what is going on.
Long story short the judge is saying that even if everything stated in the testimony were accepted to be true then there still isn't a law which was broken and therefore there isn't anyway the lawsuit can go forward. The court IS NOT saying that all of the testimony was true... unfortunately this was all a misinterpretation of what the judge said.
I didn't say that it was a sentencing. There are many different types of hearings.This isn't a sentencing, that doesn't make the information invalid.
Which should raise a red flag smart one.
Probably not, but when you're arguing ethics to convince someone to vote you, then you should do your best to not be a complete piece of shit, no?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/20271...m_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Legitimate lol, Leftists/Democrats can fix literally everything on the way to the election and have the nerve to blame others for their fuck ups.
@Jack V Savage Defend your bitch now