I didn't dismiss the study. I was driving and didn't even look at it other than reading the conclusion you posted.
I am simply noting that it wasn't conclusive, and the one study doesn't invalidate or trump hundreds of others.
LMAOOOOOOO
I just opened the study. The full text isn't available, it's just an abstract. You cannot see the study design.
OMFG look at this, here's how dumb you are.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0309174015300188
Translated since you're scientifically illiterate
"We did a google search and found poorly designed (epidemiological, the exact type of study I told you is incapable of being conclusive) studies. We analyzed 11 of these shit studies, 4 of them showed red meat intake is associated with heart disease, and 5 of them showed it's not. Further research needed"
1. I asked you for mechanistic data. I know that you don't know what that is, but I asked for it anyways.
2. I pointed out that epidemiological and population studies have poor design and are incapable of being conclusive
3. You went out and found an ABSTRACT FROM A STUDY, where the full text wasn't available.
4. The abstract states they did a google search for epidemiology studies about red meat and heart disease
5. 4 of them showed an association, 5 of them did not.
You are so fucking bad at this.