- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Messages
- 3,562
- Reaction score
- 0
Odds are a quantification of public perception. Do you know of a more accurate gauge?
Point is, they only tell us so much.
Odds are a quantification of public perception. Do you know of a more accurate gauge?
Fair points, and it will be interesting to see if Floyd had the total dispespect for Conor's power that he did for Gatti's.Buster wasn't short camp or overweight when he fought Tyson. He was a 29-4 world ranked boxer who had fought for a legit belt. He was in his best shape ever that night---as noted by the commentators who spoke of his prior history of being out of shape.
But apparently it is a bigger upset. Buster was a 42-1 underdog, and Conor (laughably) is only a 25-1 dog.
Andre Berto has been insulted worse than anybody in this whole fiasco, as oddsmakers think Conor has as good a chance as he did.
Watch Floyd-Gatti if you think Floyd's only a counterpuncher. He was tagging him repeatedly with LEAD RIGHTS. Gatti is 10x the boxer of Conor. If Floyd wants a first round tko, he gets one.
That's a terrible comparison. All it takes is one punch in boxing/MMA to change the outcome, that variable doesn't exist in a running competition.
That's funny I was actually going to mention the hamstring pull of Michael Johnson vs Donovan Bailey in their 150 meter super race, but that outcome is different from a punchers chance. Likewise, tripping someone accidentally in a race isn't same as a KO.Disagree, runner could fall, trip, ankle roll. Likely similar vegas odds to Conor landing something big on Floyd.