Discussion in 'The Wasteland' started by Cooliox, Nov 10, 2017.
I legitimately just did a spit-take.
Nate hasn’t fought anyone since that MJ fight besides Conor, so not sure how you can say he’s stepped up his game.
Nate NEVER was a top 5 LW. I don’t know where people get this shit from, the guy is good at beating the Jim Miller’s of the world but has never beat an elite fighter in his career (i guess maybe besides the Conor one).
He’s not being underrated, he got completely blown up and was overrated after the Conor win.
Nate would lose literally everyone in the top of the division at LW. His best chance to beat anyone relevant is probably only Conor.
Also, Ferguson will choke out Conor. Definitely won’t be an easier fight than facing Nate “Ive never checked a leg kick in my life” Diaz.
You might be on to something
Them Albini briefs...^
So a fighter goes 2-3 in a 3 year span and becomes top 5 on a 1 fight win streak? Got it...
Or maybe the UFC bumped him up in the rankings to make it look like he fought a top 5 fighter to justify his title shot. I mean Dennis Siver went from unranked to top 10 when he fought Conor...
Anyone who thought he’d beat Floyd is a fool and has questionable knowledge incombat sports. I’m not sure that many do think he’ll beat Tony other than his fans. I think it’s a horrible fight for Connor. He’s as durable as nate but a lot more spiteful on the feet and on the ground. Unlike the last fight with nate Connor will get subbed or kod if the fight goes past the 2nd round
Nate Diaz would get abused by Ferguson and absolutely destroyed by Woodley and GSP. That opinion is backed up by the fact that Diaz has only been a gate-keeper at 155 and totally irrelevant at 170.
He's a maniac, maniac on the floor
And he's dancing like he's never danced before...
Nate Diaz fought 4 times at 170 long ago. He beat one nobody (Markham) and beat a well past his prime low level gate-keeper (Davis). He got beat by the Korean Stun-Gun and embarrased by 21-year old MacDonald in just his 3rd UFC fight. So now all of sudden Nate Diaz can go up to 170 and beat the best there is when he isn't even a title contender at 155? No sale to anyone who knows anything about MMA.
I bet you play in the basement with McGregor and Diaz action figure dolls. Anyone can have an opinion. Facts are what determine if the opinion is valid or not...There are no facts to support Nate Diaz being relevant in the WW division.
You're just proving my point that you're too biased to acknowledge the rankings at the time, and prefer to stick to your own narrative.
Lol the UFC rankings are a joke. Nate Diaz was in no way, shape, or form a top 5 LW when Conor fought him. It's funny that you actually go by those bullshit rankings.
What would you know about math? Nate Diaz is lower than toe cheese at 170. What has Nate done at 170 that ever mattered? Go ahead, please elaborate on Nate's big successes at 170 that would make reasonable people believe that Nate Diaz (scrawny with zero wrestling chops) can beat Woodley and GSP...
2 Atomic bomb on civilian people, napalm on civilian people, 500k children killed during embargo.... Indecence.... .. Even cheered..by majority of Usa citizen... Tolerable that's the word.
He how about go fuk yourself you revisionist lying piece of shit ?
The fuking Japanese attacked us and we're trying to take over the world with Hitler you delusional jack off. We had to end that quickly or we would have been invaded.
Go spread your anti American propaganda to people who don't know any better moron.
Everyone who who was booked to fight Conor, mysteriously crept up the rankings after the fight was booked.
Its a known trend.
Hiroshima, nagasaki... Revisionism ? Haha.
Idiot, ur governement did let Japanese attack Pearl harbour.. Idiot.
Idiot, ur governement did lie about the Vietnam attack. (Mc Namara did attest, he even cried when he was confessing that all was a lie )
They also did the same lie about mass destruction weapon of Irak...
Result millions civilian died. And children still have health problem, in Vietnam..
Revisionnism ? U are Idiot and revisionism.
Idiot, usa did nothing on Hitler, it was Russia who fought Hitler nazi regim. Idiot usa banks did finance Hitler..
Without America Hitler takes over the world and ends up sterilizing you and your ilk you retard.
No we didn't "let" anyone attack pearl harbor. More lies and anti American propaganda. What a shocker coming from an Arab. I'm surprised you haven't answered me with "Death to America"
We saved the friggin entire world from tyrannical world domination moron.
Next time you question that, close your hand in a car door (if there are cars in the third world shit hole you and yours live in, and just say "Thank you"
Separate names with a comma.