You're obviously a troll and not even trying very hard since that is all total crap. The rest of your post is irrelevant since the point is the behaviour of the POTUS and whether it merits impeachment. Clinton didn't get elected, as your lot is so fond of proclaiming, so it's meaningless in it's connection to the question, "Is the president of the United States a dangerous fucking crook who gave secret intelligence to top Russian officials while hosting them in the White House of all fucking places, and who engaged in obstruction of justice by asking Comey to back off the investigation?" I provided what I consider to be confirmation of the second act. See if you can refute it without mentioning Clinton.