Communism will win.

You are so weird.

You talk about 'Big black cock' quite often. You were talking about BBC and Mandingo porn in the Mayberry just earlier today. And that was like the +10th time I have seen you talking about BBC porn and 'BBC'.


And then you regularly spew anti-Semitic garbage.

Jews have been HUGE victims under Communism.


What are you by the way? A white man or what?
Marx was a Jew. Jews were over-represented among the Bolshevik. Of course Jews have been victimized by communism, but that's because communism fucks everybody who isn't at the very top at that very moment, and one ideological deviation could end your life. Even today, Jews are over-represented among communists and other left-wing radicals.
 
I hear if you kill them they win.

So yes, communists will definitely win.
 
I like capitalism as long as it isnt donominated by monopolies and corporations. If all that was fixed there wouldn't be so many poor people. But it seems poor people is required to make the rich even richer.
 
Communist in practice. The parts where everything is controlled in hierarchical fashion by a tiny minority at the top.

So yes, a dictatorship eventually, or like Chinese communism.

It is not so difficult to promise 72 virgins (utopian communism) to entice young people to become Jihadis (activists) and fight for the caliphate (authoritarian international control system).
You're applying communism as a catch all here. Communism is terrible, and I won't fight you on that. But not every dictatorship is communism, although all communists inherently support a dictatorship.

The Chinese are communist in name only these days. They are a government that has very little in the way of civil liberties, but they are not a centrally managed system. There are Chinese corporations that do business and trade publicly.

The jihadists tend to be vehement anti-Communists. Their proposed solution is obviously no better, as I doubt you disagree with, but they aren't communists. They're theocrats in principle, and they are bands of warlords in practice.

There is lots of evil in the world, and there's no help to be gained by looking at it through a monolithic lens. We serve ourselves better by recognizing the differences.
 
Are you stalking me?

No I just noticed it.

And then I googled searched your Sherdog name for this forum and what do you know.

BBC and your obsession with interracial cuckporn, bbc porn and other weird stuff comes up. Oh and your regular crazy antisemitic posts and just bat shit psycho babble.
 
communism has fallen apart every time is comes into contact with capitalism.
 
When people are tired of getting cucked by their boss, their representatives, their bank, and the multinational they will turn to real freedom and cut the private interests that pillage their labor. The Trumpster has pushed America the furthest left we have been since the early 1900s and its only a matter of time now until wealth and crowned heads are trampled by the huddled masses tired of getting ripped off by capitalist swine.
AYymr_mCAAABtLF.jpg%20large.jpg


You cannot refute this.
There's like 120 years of real history and testing on the books now that is mutually exclusive to your borrowed, wishful hypothesis.
 
No I just noticed it.

And then I googled searched your Sherdog name for this forum and what do you know.

BBC and your obsession with interracial cuckporn, bbc porn and other weird stuff comes up. Oh and your regular crazy antisemitic posts and just bat shit psycho babble.


Anitsematic, me .... how do you figure?
 
When people are tired of getting cucked by their boss, their representatives, their bank, and the multinational they will turn to real freedom and cut the private interests that pillage their labor. The Trumpster has pushed America the furthest left we have been since the early 1900s and its only a matter of time now until wealth and crowned heads are trampled by the huddled masses tired of getting ripped off by capitalist swine.
AYymr_mCAAABtLF.jpg%20large.jpg


You cannot refute this.

I.E. my fighting career is shit. I didn't make millions of dollars like GSP, Jon Jones, Brock Lesner, Conor McGregor, etc. . I'm now poor and barely scraping by as i have no skills other than a gym rat trainer at a second rate training gym. So it's all the capitalists fault.
 
Lol, communism is just government fascists instead of banking fascists.

Open your mind to new ideas that don't come from the early 20th century.

Worker co-ops, crypto-currency, new ideas are the path forward.

Economic democracy is where its at. Check out After Capitalism by David Schweickart. I think you'll dig it.
 
You're applying communism as a catch all here. Communism is terrible, and I won't fight you on that. But not every dictatorship is communism, although all communists inherently support a dictatorship.

The Chinese are communist in name only these days. They are a government that has very little in the way of civil liberties, but they are not a centrally managed system. There are Chinese corporations that do business and trade publicly.

The jihadists tend to be vehement anti-Communists. Their proposed solution is obviously no better, as I doubt you disagree with, but they aren't communists. They're theocrats in principle, and they are bands of warlords in practice.

There is lots of evil in the world, and there's no help to be gained by looking at it through a monolithic lens. We serve ourselves better by recognizing the differences.

I didn't mean it as a catch all, I just meant what the imposition of communism looks like. Of course I agree that not every dictatorship or authoritarian system is based on the imposition of communism. It's just one mechanism to bring it about.

I view it more as a mechanism to establish the centrally managed authoritarian system. So Marxist revolutions, as seen in Russia and China, are more a means to an ends. Once power has been established then it's mission accomplished and to hell with whatever utopian slogans and sales pitches were used to get there. The bigger players in Marxist revolutions know full well it's about power.

I didn't mean to imply that I thought Jihadi's were pro communist. I was just drawing a parallel of motivating ideologies aimed at creating activists to bring about a larger system. Power for their ideology.
 
I didn't mean it as a catch all, I just meant what the imposition of communism looks like. Of course I agree that not every dictatorship or authoritarian system is based on the imposition of communism. It's just one mechanism to bring it about.

I view it more as a mechanism to establish the centrally managed authoritarian system. So Marxist revolutions, as seen in Russia and China, are more a means to an ends. Once power has been established then it's mission accomplished and to hell with whatever utopian slogans and sales pitches were used to get there. The bigger players in Marxist revolutions know full well it's about power.

I didn't mean to imply that I thought Jihadi's were pro communist. I was just drawing a parallel of motivating ideologies aimed at creating activists to bring about a larger system. Power for their ideology.
Fair enough. But isn't that the story of power? It corrupts, and invariably, large governments are corrupt and serve those in power. Even without things like nepotism, back room deals, self-aggrandizing/self-seeking power, and the other things that we are used to here in the US (and which are considerably worse in most other places), we have systems that are designed to protect those in power. Bureaucracy slows down progress, leaders can keep their hands clean while the systems work beneath them, and all the while, the people are the ones getting screwed. Why anyone would want the government to have more power is beyond me. Anything but libertarianism makes absolutely no fucking sense through the lens of history.
 
Fair enough. But isn't that the story of power? It corrupts, and invariably, large governments are corrupt and serve those in power. Even without things like nepotism, back room deals, self-aggrandizing/self-seeking power, and the other things that we are used to here in the US (and which are considerably worse in most other places), we have systems that are designed to protect those in power. Bureaucracy slows down progress, leaders can keep their hands clean while the systems work beneath them, and all the while, the people are the ones getting screwed. Why anyone would want the government to have more power is beyond me. Anything but libertarianism makes absolutely no fucking sense through the lens of history.

Yes I think that is the story of power. The lessons of history say it is unwise to allow power consolidation to occur to that extent. Hence, the idea of decentralizing it as a safeguard to protect the wider population from inevitable abuses. Of course, even when decentralization occurs there can still be power abuse on the smaller scale, but I think it is similar to how corporations work in that when there is competition and options it keeps them in check. A corporate monopoly is frowned upon for a reason.

So, always a balance.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,234,244
Messages
55,267,421
Members
174,714
Latest member
F5CHAMPIONSHIP
Back
Top