- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 14,828
- Reaction score
- 10,728
I wouldn't quite say that something that is decelerating on impact is a push by definition. I mean you can start from a standstill and still accelerate, albeit slowly, while pushing something, or a bag. It's just a very slow acceleration. I do get your point though.something that is decelerating on impact with the target is a push by definition. an object must be accelerating on impact to be considered a strike. this is the snap you are talking about, if a punch isn't accelerating it is just a push with the knuckles. its a weird trick of physics and don't quote me on it, but an object that is traveling at slightly slower speed but is still accelerating, imparts more force than a faster moving object that is slowing down. maybe someone more educated than me like @Sano can provide the proper equation for it.
I don't exactly know if it's the fixed level of acceleration (m/s) or velocity on impact that matters more than if the punch is accelerating or decelerating at that moment. I know a little bit about angular velocities and force production, but that's a little more complicated than what I've worked with. Basics of force is F = m x a, as you know, and it doesn't really account for that. However, it also goes to show how oversimplified that formula is in regards to the human body. This is not a train or a car hitting a wall. The human body is infinitely more complex. During impact, the effect of the mass can change in an instant, including variables like you already mentioned like alignment, weight transfer, but also tension at the point of impact. Another thing that plays into it, is which kind of punch is being thrown, at what target, how far away so on.
In this study (1) they used an accelerometer on various amateur boxers with varying experience, during a jab and cross
The blue line, x, is the acceleration. Here it topped out about halfway through full extension and started decelerating preparing to be joltet back to the guard. However this is hitting air with straight punches, things change when there is force applied to an object and when the punches change. Also they were instructed to hit as fast as possible, so it's more of a speed thing. Maybe however, straight punches generally tops out a little before full extension as you are recoiling back into the guard.
In this little interesting experiment on amateur boxers concluded that velocity was the main driver of force over biomechanical application, although the two have something to do with each other (2). It's hard to really conlcude anything though, other than velocity is very important.
I found this interesting one with the Klitschko brothers measuring acceleration during a punch on the heavybag (3). Unfortunately, it doesn't state which kind of punch and in general is not that high quality. It looks to me like it was a lead hook, which would make sense with the findings. Here it shows that acceleration was constant, although declining, throughout the punch, reaching maximum velocity right as the punch reached the bag. The bag contact was also only 20ms, which shows a powerful snap and recoil, which is well within the limits of the stretch shortening cycle/SSC (> 200ms):
In baseball pitching, which is probably the type of throwing activity that is most simular biomechanically to an overhand, the acceleration keeps increasing untill ball release, whereafter the deceleration starts (4). Ball release being a very simular end position as the end position of the overhand reaching the target:
So in this case it's fair to assume as well that the punch accelerates untill impact. Btw, baseball pitchers create tremendous amounts of G force in their hips, torso, shoulders and wrists. Much more than any boxer, however they also end up like this:
It does lead into the other thing you guys were discussing though, and what @YoungCashMoney was saying, which is that there are several ways to generate power in a punch. As I wrote about in the old thread about power production: http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/125416715/
Sitting down using primarily vertical reactionary forces while transferring the energy, or exploding forward more using more horizontal reactionary forces, like a pitcher or a javelin thrower. Realisticly, you use both forces but keep the horizontal one under control to stay balanced, depending on the situation.
This probably didn't help much. Generally there's not very much in the literature about boxing mechanics and kinetic transfer and most of it is pretty poor quality. I wish we had something like this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445080/. However, this one (5) was interesting in discussing how lower body power matters in punching power, the SSC, how individuals can have slightly different patterns that should be encouraged if they work for them and how lighter amateurs might emphasize speed while HW pro boxers deliver power at closer range with a more flexed elbow position to deliver more effective mass. Then again that differs from person to person too.
It is certainly clear that velocity is important, and that most punches seem to keep accelerating untill meeting the target, if the punch is a power punch. However depending on the goal and defensive responsibility, maybe especially straight punches use more of the SSC and decelerate before impact. I can also imagine that being the case with combination punches as you need to retract faster. Weight also seems to matter in the way a punch is thrown.
I'm compiling a lot of this stuff and at some point when I get my blog up and running I'll try to cover it more in depth and make some actual practical applications out of it. Btw, sounds very interesting with your idea about trying to exponentially accelerate untill contact with the heavybag to practice the power @eternaldarkness. That's one I need to try out.
Last edited: