CNN's "Town Hall" Meeting Deteriorates Into Infantile, One-sided Event

Wait, do people think CNN went live with a bunch of high school kids WITHOUT screening questions first?
 
I will take this kid's word over right or left wing fake news....this kid has more brains than anyone who believes CNN are after the truth...

tenor.gif
 
Are you lying, or willfully stupid?

I proved it.

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-jr-said-money-pouring-in-from-russia-2018-2

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-trump-jr-profile-20170712-story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...8eed22-ba9e-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/trump-lawyers-up-conflicts-of-interest/526185/

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/eric-trump-russia-investment-golf-course

http://time.com/4433880/donald-trump-ties-to-russia/Try literally any of the above. You’re insane, a troll, or a moron.

Let’s recap:
You claimed that Trump has zero financial ties to Russia. I showed you that his own son (and his other one, too) have openly bragged about all the financial ties they have to Russia for YEARS.

You go into denial, flounder, spin, cry, attack, and do anything except admit that you are 100% undeniably wrong and owned.

Just try to justify Trump Jr’s quote with your batshit stupid claim. You’ve done nothing but dodge and deny and attack (very credible) sources.


A buffoon disputing something on the basis of “nuh-uh! I don’t like it so it isn’t true!” doesn’t count as a legitimate dispute.


One more time.

Trump Jr said these words: "In terms of high-end product influx into the US, Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets”

Your claim that Trump has no financial dealings with Russia is utterly, flatly false.
His own son has publicly stated otherwise to investors. Give it up. You whining is just making you look even sadder.
<{you!}>
 
CNN reports the Mueller investigation shows that kid is a Russian implant and is there to stoke the flames and cause a riot.
 
Tucker could have at least let him ask his damn question and/or make his statement.

But that would have proved the right-wing narrative false and revealed that the CNN production team was only trying to offer editing suggestions to get students' question as tight and concise and grammatically correct as possible so that as many students as possible could have a voice during a time-limited broadcast.

This is a kid who said to Tucker, "They edited what I had wrote." Not exactly an English major.
 
I took your answer out of context? Was it sarcastic?

So you do take strangers at their word? This is hard to follow, if only you would just directly answer the question instead of refusing to in order to avoid looking like a sensationalist idiot.

Yes, I was being sarcastic. Try to read a little bit harder into my full statement. Technically, everyone who works at CNN is a stranger to me as well. The question is who has more credibility at this point, not who is the "stranger."
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the crowd was peppered with paid CNN shills who there just to encourage bad behavior. Those people should know better and so should CNN. It was an embarrassment, and I doubt they even recognize what they did as being bad behavior.

Translation
I don't like what CNN reports because I don't agree with it and my dear leader said they were fake news. I also don't believe that kids can think for themselves because I get told what to think from all my tribal right wing news sites.
 
Or, CNN can provide the "proof" that his claims are false by releasing the e-mails. Both sides should have access.

Translation...

I believe the kid when he is saying bad things about CNN but when kid challenges NRA spokesperson kid is clearly a plant.
 
Back
Top