- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 3,486
- Reaction score
- 1
One of the axiomatic cornerstones of Aristotelian logic is:
"That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
If the people putting forward these claims refuse to support the claims with any kind of evidence, or allowing the claim maker to face scrutiny, then the public at large has no choice but to dismiss the claims without further analysis.
The cornerstone of the WR is to pretend a story about collusion is completely false because someone from the FBI hasn't personally briefed them on the investigation.
A smart person would read this and take from it what seems to reasonably fit with what's apparent. A dipshit would immediately dismiss all of it because they don't like what it implies.