Canada on track to lead world in resettling refugees by 2020

Scheme

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
8,748
Reaction score
9,851
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada...d-in-resettling-refugees-by-2020-passing-u-s/

In September 2016, for his final address to the United Nations General Assembly as president of the United States, Barack Obama said America would resettle 110,000 refugees in the coming year. It would represent not only be a substantial increase aimed at addressing the global refugee crisis, but also a “test of our common humanity,” Obama said.

Seven weeks later, Donald Trump was elected president. He didn’t exactly try for Obama’s target.

In 2017, America resettled about 33,000 refugees, according to UN data. It was a huge drop from the 97,000 resettled refugees in the United States during Obama’s final year in 2016 or the 66,000 from 2015. For many years, America resettled more refugees than the rest of the world combined (Resettlement refers to refugees moving from asylum to a country that will accept them permanently). Last year was the first time since 1980 that did not happen, according to a study released last week by the Pew Research Centre. This, even when the global refugee population surged to an all-time high.

READ MORE: Canada’s admirable, doomed effort to save the world order

America’s decline in resettling refugees is so precipitous that, within a few years, the Land of the Free may no longer be the global leader in that category. That title could soon belong to Canada.

“Historically, the U.S. has been the big hero,” says Jennifer Hyndman, director of the Centre for Refugee Studies at York University. “Canada has always done more, per capita, than the U.S. But in terms of absolute numbers, the U.S. has had much bigger than anyone else.”

USA_Canada_Australia_UK_chartbuilder-300x169.png


Canada’s growth has been slow and steady. In 2012, the country resettled about 10,000 refugees between both private and government-assisted sponsorship. In the aftermath of the Syrian refugee crisis, Canada had an outlier year by resettling nearly 47,000 refugees in 2016. Last year’s figures—about 27,000 resettled refugees—“is just a return to the new normal,” Hyndman says.

Australia, meanwhile, resettled about 15,000 refugees in 2017, ranking it the third top nation in that category. The United Kingdom had around 6,000. If you take the U.S. and Canada out of the equation as well, all the other countries combined for 26,000 resettled refugees last year, according to Pew’s analysis.

Canada will likely continue to increase its annual tally. The Trudeau government has promised to increase the number of government assisted refugees to 10,000 annually by 2020 (up from its current 7,500 per year). The government equally said that it expects annual private refugee sponsorships to rise up to 20,000 by 2020—a year that might put Canada above America in absolute numbers for the first time, if America continues its downfall.

There was a time, not long ago, when the United States actively sought more refugees. “Refugees at that time were points scored for the capitalist team against communism,” Hyndman says. Now American NGOs that resettle refugees are laying off staff because often their budgets are based on how many only refugee they resettle. “The bottom is falling out of people’s budgets.”

America’s current resettlement numbers haven’t been this low since the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001—and Hyndman predicts they will go lower still.

“We might very well pass [America],” says Tom Denton, executive director of sponsorship and administrations at Winnipeg’s Hospitality House Refugee Ministry. “But it says more about the failure of the United States than the initiative of Canada.”

And while Denton says Canadians might think of it as a feather in our cap if that day comes, “from my perspective here, it’s still a huge failure [in Canada] because we have so many refugees people want to sponsor and they can’t. I’ve got a waiting list of 30,000.”

Being number one could also pose other challenges, especially populist sentiments continue to grow in North America—as witnessed most recently with the election victory of Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

“My hope is people don’t see this as a liability,” Hyndman says. “We don’t want to be the top resettlement country just to be the top resettlement country. We want to be the country that does resettlement best—and I think we’re on track to do that.”

Funny how Canada is about as far as any place on the globe from the main source of the refugees, yet for some reason it is on pace to taking the #1 spot in refugee resettlement. There are plenty of places that are closer and have more people living there to support the refugee systems, yet for some odd reason Canada is taking the brunt of them, despite constant outcries from the major cities saying that they are at full capacity.
 
Canada is such a better place than America to live it is unreal.

Only cultural marxist soulless people and make america white again prefer it. All about china or japan. Even Russia or Turkey is better depending what you want. Id rather live in Italy or spain. Fuck the anglosphere! Latin America>>> west. The entire non wester world is superior in the darwinian sense. They will survive and we will invade and win.
 
That must be all those people who said they're leaving for Canada if Trump got elected.
 
Canada is mostly empty space anyway. They could bring over millions and millions of refugees if they wanted to.
map-2006-pop-density-canada-sz01-en.gif
 
Funny thing is Canada probably wouldn't accept most of the people praising them in this thread
 
Funny thing is Canada probably wouldn't accept most of the people praising them in this thread
I have a conviction for pot in 1997, Canada won't let me in, but they just legalized pot? But pedo asses are welcome
 
Canada is mostly empty space anyway. They could bring over millions and millions of refugees if they wanted to.
map-2006-pop-density-canada-sz01-en.gif
<JagsKiddingMe>

They will concentrate in the major cities like all the other immigrants.They will put strain on the system.

You think Canada is going to spend billions on clearing land and building nice homes for millions and millions of refugees?

lol @ wanting to cut down the forests and further ruin the environment. Good job libs.

<Prem973>
 
Canada is mostly empty space anyway. They could bring over millions and millions of refugees if they wanted to.
map-2006-pop-density-canada-sz01-en.gif

The refugees don't go to those areas. They just overpopulate our already overpopulated urban centers, bringing crime and poverty with them.
 
Canada is mostly empty space anyway. They could bring over millions and millions of refugees if they wanted to.
map-2006-pop-density-canada-sz01-en.gif

What makes you think the refugees would settle anywhere else than the already over-packed cities?

Immigrants in general are the least likely groups of people to live outside of major cities.

If they wanted to live in areas where social services are scarce, then they would've just remained where they originally resided.

Good luck getting anyone but "white boys" and Canadian natives, to live in near-arctic temperatures.
 
Back
Top