I had that as being very close and expected a narrow decision or split in Ryder's favour. I wouldn't call it a robbery but I have no idea how one judge scored it so wide.
I only looked at B365s odds but I thought they were off from the start. They had Arnfield at +600 during the middle rounds when I (and I think Paulie M in the commentary) had him slightly ahead.
I think quite a few of those early rounds were very tight and the books seemed to give them all to Ryder...obviously the judges didn't. Although I'm not sure one of them was actually watching the fight.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.