Boon or bane?

I tried it. It's like regular porn, but with awkward positioning (the male standin is pretty much motionless in an awkward semi-seated position) and you get a migraine.
 
We watch it together the only problem is we have slightly different tastes she likes blondes with large breasts and I like my women dark haired and feisty hence why I married her lol.
Some porn is wrong like the squirting and simulated rape stuff but normal porn is completely fine.
Eventually you guys will not enjoy sex without having all the porn to get you jumpstarted. You will need more and more risque stuff to feed your eyes and brain with the longer you guys do that.

You should go to the website "yourbrainonporn.com"
 
Eventually you guys will not enjoy sex without having all the porn to get you jumpstarted. You will need more and more risque stuff to feed your eyes and brain with the longer you guys do that.

You should go to the website "yourbrainonporn.com"
15 years in mate and we don't show any sign of slowing down yet. I like you Rip but I don't think religious prudes should be taken seriously about sex as they only find evidence to support there religious views and ignore everything else.
 
15 years in mate and we don't show any sign of slowing down yet. I like you Rip but I don't think religious prudes should be taken seriously about sex as they only find evidence to support there religious views and ignore everything else.
I like you too.

And if you think that, it's fine.

By the way,that website is "yourbrainonporn.com" is founded by an atheist. And he's politically liberal.
 
I like you too.

And if you think that, it's fine.

By the way,that website is "yourbrainonporn.com" is founded by an atheist. And he's politically liberal.
Rip, I've been drinking copious amounts of alcohol and smoking the marijuana over the holidays. Am I a bad person?
 
Rip, I've been drinking copious amounts of alcohol and smoking the marijuana over the holidays. Am I a bad person?
I don't think so necessarily.

But ask yourself why you feel the need to drink that much? You don't have to answer me.
 
Should pass these around the ghettos so those fucktards might start chugging on their grub snake and stop breeding like rabbits.
 
I believe that porn should be banned in the USA.

Work on yourself as a man, then go out and win the heart of a real woman.
If porn is banned, I'm gonna try to make big bucks selling imagination aka. erotic literature
 
I don't think so necessarily.

But ask yourself why you feel the need to drink that much? You don't have to answer me.
Well, it makes my job alot more tolerable and interesting(school bus driver). It also helps allieviate the shame of all the hardcore porn I watch.
 
If porn is banned, I'm gonna try to make big bucks selling imagination aka. erotic literature
According to yourbrainonporn.com, it's the online video porn that's the most damaging to boys and men.
 
Delete.

Not worth it.
 
Last edited:
You have a one generation trend, that is being used to build a model.

In terms of science, and standards of evidence, that is worth the Charmin extra soft I wipe my arse with.

No, the statistical data is far more than just seeing one generation of people. That was a very WR response regarding scientific research though.
 
I believe that porn should be banned in the USA.

Work on yourself as a man, then go out and win the heart of a real woman.

Disallowing prostitution while allowing porn is an inconsistency.
 
15 years in mate and we don't show any sign of slowing down yet. I like you Rip but I don't think religious prudes should be taken seriously about sex as they only find evidence to support there religious views and ignore everything else.

I agree. It's the same logic that, if you take it further, results in the stupid crap many muslims force their women to wear to lower temptation. And just like this issue shows that people handle it fine, most places in the world show that men handle women in normal, and even revealing, clothing without going crazy.

To be able to point at someone not handling porn well isn't saying much either since one is hard pressed to find things that there aren't some people abusing in some way.
 
I disagree. I think the single most selfish act I see today is people reproducing. Our planet is over populated.

Once you take reproduction out of the equation, there is no point to monogomy.

Wrong. The whole point of monogamy is that it provides the most sound environment for raising children, which, when applied on a larger scale, leads to stable, healthy and strong societies. I can't help but laugh at those who still dare to challenge this apodictic truth. Trying out other methods has proven to be a vain effort. Proof - an entire generation of self-loathers who think it's selfish to impose themselves on the world by procreating. Enjoy your quiet retreat from the gene pool is all I have to say to them.
 
Wrong. The whole point of monogamy is that it provides the most sound environment for raising children, which, when applied on a larger scale, leads to stable, healthy and strong societies. I can't help but laugh at those who still dare to challenge this apodictic truth. Trying out other methods has proven to be a vain effort. Proof - an entire generation of self-loathers who think it's selfish to impose themselves on the world by procreating. Enjoy your quiet retreat from the gene pool is all I have to say to them.

Reading is fundamental.

I do not deny that the family unit serves a purpose.

If the grounds of debate are the family unit, and the roll it serves in stable societies, you will win that debate.

If the grounds of debate are about whether we live on a planet with finite resources, and a ever increasing population, and whether that reproduction is a selfish act, I think I will do just fine in that debate.

Funny to hear conservatives argue how our debt is mortgaging the future, and yet their seems to be little concern for conservation of resources.
 
We just had the baby boomers, WTF are you talking about?

That's not an argument, that's just stating something that everyone knows and that of course has been analyzed. Again a very WR response to scientific research, blurting some irrelevant fact and think it sounds like you've countered all the research that's been done. Just like the religious people do when they try to counter science they don't understand but don't want to be true.
 
Back
Top