- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 14,051
- Reaction score
- 3,620
Eddie would take it. Penn was fighting scrubs like Florian and Sanchez. Eddie was fighting real top light weights like Kawajiri and Hellboy.
Robbed is a stretch. But it was a very clear example of how different ways of scoring. Dunham rocked Sherk and wrecked him for 20-40 seconds, and Sherk ‘controlled’ Dunham for 2-3 minutes.Evan Dunham was robbed absolutely brutally against him.
I agree and that's what most people remember about him but that was 37 year old Sherk. 2006 Sherk would have smashed Dunham like he did Ken-Flo
I’d say odds would rightfully be about Penn -170. Maybe as high as -220.
Would have been a great fight. Melendez too.
It was boring as fuck, nobody liked watching him because he was like DJ before he started finishing people.Frankie's run was something special.
Even when he LnP it was fun to watch, because he was so fast...and so small
When the fight was announced I told myself: "Frankie will take a round from Penn...heck, maybe even 2. That"s how good he is"
Aoki v BJ in 2007 would have been a blast. BJ wouldn’t fight him the way Melendez did. They would have rolled, for sure. BJ is way stronger. Aoki is more of a sub wizard. BJ probably wins by TKO, but hot damn it would have been fun to see.Eddie would take it. Penn was fighting scrubs like Florian and Sanchez. Eddie was fighting real top light weights like Kawajiri and Hellboy.
Aoki v BJ in 2007 would have been a blast. BJ wouldn’t fight him the way Melendez did. They would have rolled, for sure. BJ is way stronger. Aoki is more of a sub wizard. BJ probably wins by TKO, but hot damn it would have been fun to see.
Robbed is a stretch. But it was a very clear example of how different ways of scoring. Dunham rocked Sherk and wrecked him for 20-40 seconds, and Sherk ‘controlled’ Dunham for 2-3 minutes.
I’m glad the rules have changed and using today’s rules, Dunham clearly wins the round, and the fight.
It was boring as fuck, nobody liked watching him because he was like DJ before he started finishing people.
He also lost to BJ in their first fight. That should have never been a trilogy.
BJ wouldn’t fight him the way Melendez did. They would have rolled, for sure.
Controlled the same way Couture controlled Vera.Dude, rewatch the fight. No matter then or now, Dunham should've won.
Sherk never got that much control. His only success was giving Dunham a good cut.
Aoki v BJ in 2007 would have been a blast. BJ wouldn’t fight him the way Melendez did. They would have rolled, for sure. BJ is way stronger. Aoki is more of a sub wizard. BJ probably wins by TKO, but hot damn it would have been fun to see.
EDIT: what’s funny is you didn’t even mention Aoki, but my brain just went there when I saw Hellboy and Kid lol
He outwrestled the blanket Fitch 2 years later.
Dunham was robbed oh so many times.
Against TJ Grant. Against RDA. One judge even tried to rob him against Tyson Griffin.
Who knows how his career would've changed? He could've easily become a #1 contender, but crappy luck.
I remember Sherk very well, and I remember how good he was. Especially on roids lol
He was a problematic wrestler to deal with, he knew how to mix it up and beating him was definitely a huge deal (never mind that GSP made it look like a walk in the park)
Controlled the same way Couture controlled Vera.
We only disagree by degree. I agree with you that Dunham should have won. I disagree with the word “robbery”.
You cannot name even one Edgar fight that was "boring as fuck"
I personally saw 3 out of 5 rounds in Penn-Edgar 1 as 10-10, giving other 2 to Edgar.
For 2 rounds, and barely.
Then Fitch took him down and didn't let him either breath or put his head up.