Bill Maher sides with Milo, defends having sex with 14 year old boys

[Big Al's Texas BBQ]

What a ridiculous comparison.

Who here would honestly leave their 12 or 13 year old son with Milo after hearing what he said?
If you say you would then you're an atrocious parent.

You would only have an issue because he's a guy. I bet you if Milo was a woman and made the same comments, you wouldn't give 2 fucks.

 

[Deleted member 196663]

Why do we "shit on" victims of sexual abuse who go on to become abusers themselves?

Milo is walking the middle ground right now. He's not a molester (I assume - and hope) but he is using his public platform to sell the "benefits" of becoming the victim of a predator pederast.

I think we have reached a point in public society where we should be capable of challenging someone's words without also having to destroy them simultaneously.

 

[freakyfarley]

To be fair, neither one can be called a pedophilia apologist. Technically both are, in the situations cited, hebephilia apologists.

Not this again.

 

[BVG]

I am on the side that you can't rape a dude unless you are sticking foreign bodies in his ass or other openings. Now you can molest a boy by grabbing and poking and prodding...but no you can't force a dude to both get an erection, and then ejaculate if he's under any kind of duress.

edit: After some thought, I guess under extreme circumstances I guess if you pumped up the penis by injecting it with that shit porn guys use to fake the erection...

You can't say alcohol because to get the kid to a point where he can't fight back would also likely mean he's got liquor dick.

 

[BVG]

I listened to the segment and here are my thoughts.....

I think most men can agree that if a hot teacher came on to them when they were 14 years old and they had sex with her that they would not feel that they were raped. However if your 14 year old daughter was seduced by a grown man who was her teacher how would you feel about it? I would want to beat him within an inch of his life and call the police. The idea that women can not be sexual predators is false. You don't need to overpower someone physically to molest or rape them. You can mess with them psychologically and manipulate them in to having a sexual relationship with you and children are easy targets because of their innocence and inexperience with sexual relationships. This goes not only for prepubescent kids but also teenagers.

The difference is that the girl would still be able to go through with intercourse under duress, where as the boy would lose the erection thus ending intercourse.

She could suck him until her jaw falls off, he would likely still remain flacid due to being stressed out and not wanting to be there. But a girl doesn't have that luxury. Wanting too or not, it's all about penetration and she can be penetrated regardless.

 

[MysticNinjaJay]

The difference is that the girl would still be able to go through with intercourse under duress, where as the boy would lose the erection thus ending intercourse.

She could suck him until her jaw falls off, he would likely still remain flacid due to being stressed out and not wanting to be there. But a girl doesn't have that luxury. Wanting too or not, it's all about penetration and she can be penetrated regardless.

My comment didn't have anything to do with the mechanics of rape. It is certainly more difficult for a woman to rape a man through vaginal intercourse with him (although I read a disturbing story on Reddit once where a boy said his teenage cousin raped him this way when he was 9 by forcing his penis in to her) because he would have to sustain an erection. But that is irrelevant to my point. What I am saying is that women can be sexual predators. They can manipulate boys in to having sex with them and pursue a sexual relationship that society deems inappropriate (such as a grown woman having sex with underage teenage boys who she has access to because she is their teacher).

One interesting example that I recently looked in to is the case of White women forcing Black men to have sex with them during slavery through manipulation and threats that if they didn't give in to their demands that they would claim they tried to rape them. This was dramatized in some old Blaxploitation movies but there is real documentation of this happening through testimonies by Black male slaves themselves.



Inquiriesjournal.com - Sexual Relations Between Elite White Women and Enslaved Men in the Antebellum South: A Socio-Historical Analysis

The key issue here is that the relationship is inappropriate and that the woman is exerting her power and influence over the boy. Again she doesn't have to overpower him physically. She can seduce him, tell him she loves him (whether it is true or not) and intimidate him in to remaining silent about the situation by claiming he raped her or bribe him with money to keep silent. The key is that these children are not old enough to make decisions like this and they can have significant repercussions such as getting a grown woman pregnant with children you are not in a position to take care of or damaging the boys psychologically which can negatively affect their relationships with women in the future. In the heat of the moment the boy might think they are having fun. Many men might consider it to be the fulfillment of a fantasy to have sex with a hot, young teacher but the relationship is wrong and if the situation was reversed (e.g. young, male teacher has sex with teenage girl and the sexual attraction is mutual) most men would not see it the same way especially if it was their daughter.

 

[Toastytoy]

Anyone coming forward PUBLICLY as a victim of sexual molestation saying they enjoyed the experience and feel they were benefited by it is a pathetic idiot who is encouraging and empowering sexual predators.

Whether that is their intent or not it is an unthinking and selfish thing to do and they must be ostracized for it, in no uncertain terms.

get the fuck outta here, the guy is perfectly entitled to his own opinion of what happened to him

 

[ultramanhyata]

get the fuck outta here, the guy is perfectly entitled to his own opinion of what happened to him

He's entitled to his opinion in his therapist's office. Or over lunch, between friends.

But he's not entitled to use a public platform to endanger young people by potentially empowering sexual predators.

Thankfully people like you are still in the societal majority.

 

[Toastytoy]

He's entitled to his opinion in his therapist's office. Or over lunch, between friends.

But he's not entitled to use a public platform to endanger young people by potentially empowering sexual predators.

Thankfully people like you are still in the societal majority.

sure maybe in some other dumbshit country but this is the land of the free baby, where we can express our opinions. The whole wild, flailing, suppression of thoughts by the left is strange to me. Even before any of this came out people went batshit crazy every time the guy was booked somewhere, now they have the "nail in the coffin" because it's "protecting the children!!1111"

GTFO here and learn to accept that some people have different, opinions than you, unless you live in some other country (gps error?), in which case i dont care and this conversation is pointless