- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 0
You may be right and your Bellator weekend idea may have worked better financially. If Bellator NYC (which has most of Bellator's big stars from MSG) does a worse buyrate than UFC 208 (which was considered a very weak card from Brooklyn), then the Bellator experiment cannot be deemed a success. I don't think PPV will work for Bellator but we will see tonight.
As Meltzer said. They are hoping for over 200k.
Its possible but there was more buzz for Holly/GDR in NYC than tonight.
I just think it was a weird decision to make by Viacom since they care about TV ratings & basically took two big TV events off TV to experiment in PPV which has proven to be tough without a superstar.
Lets be honest here
They get $25 per PPV
If they do 200k that is $5m.
MSG is the most expensive arena in US to run, so gate will pretty much cover that/production.
Add in they over-pay for names & they might make a few million if they do $200k.
Not bad, but IMO not enough to take away & hurt TV.
People don't get that the reason Bellator can survive is the TV station owns them. That means there is one less piece of the pie to be shared.
They are cheap programming on Fri/Sat nights which are TV's lowest rated.
I think focusing on putting better TV was their way to be "different" from UFC & be seen as more fan friendly.
Instead they charge for Mitrione & 3 guys that should be retired