Play closer attention to the fights.You are just wrong, but no point arguing it. I also had no bet on the fight but did think Denise would probably win. Whatever.
Play closer attention to the fights.You are just wrong, but no point arguing it. I also had no bet on the fight but did think Denise would probably win. Whatever.
Lovato down to -155 on dimes.
Play closer attention to the fights.
Lol no way was Denise winning round 2, she also got finished and panick wrestled because the pace was getting to her.
I have no clue what fight these guys were watching, but they clearly weren't seeing the strikes that Denise was landing all fight for whatever reason. She had a huge striking advantage.Okay we disagree, but you know pace isn't part of judging criteria right? Even assumign you're right and Veta is backing up Denise the whole fight and she's subjectively 'panicked,' this doesn't magically give Veta effective striking or effective grappling. Something actually has to land on Denise, and nothing did.
Veta is not known for being a submission machine. Shocking end. Thought it would go the distance.Rd1 was clear Kielholtz, and Kielholtz was edging round 2 in my opinion.
But congrats to Veta backers especially at +200 odds. Kielholtz sub defense untested and that was the key in this fight which nobody in this thread mentioned.
Okay we disagree, but you know pace isn't part of judging criteria right? Even assumign you're right and Veta is backing up Denise the whole fight and she's subjectively 'panicked,' this doesn't magically give Veta effective striking or effective grappling. Something actually has to land on Denise, and nothing did.
I mentioned Denise was not winning round 2 and then I mentioned how she got finished because the pace was getting to her. I did not say the pace is why she was losing the round. Learn to read.