Been watching war machine trial online

...wow. so you compared a domestic violence sentence to a non-dv sentence and claim that supports "size" being a criteria?

this apple is an orange!

learn logic.



...do you consider yourself to be an idiot?

do you think size = age? do you think size = gender?

if no, WHY DID YOU POST THIS IRRELEVANT TRIPE? if yes, your problems are vast.


STILLLLLLLLLLLLL waiting to hear just how big people have to be for one to assault them with relative or literal impunity. STILLLLLLLLLLLLL waiting to see how size of victim is a factor in sentencing.

Well this is a DV case there kid. I'm guessing you have no real life experience with CJ or court cases by the way you ramble and try to belittle to prove a point since you have no pertinent examples. I'm also going to agree with poster in this thread that stated that you are most likely not college educated which is clear as day with your "arguments". Am I an idiot? Hmmm...well my bachelors degree states I attended and graduated from a top 75 college in the nation so I'm thinking not kid. I'm done with this thread as the trolls always ruin it for the grown ups with adult real life examples. I will guarantee that if/when WM is convicted he gets 10+ years due to CH and MITIGATING FACTORS (I.e. Gender and size). Will wait to bump and own the trolls once again.
 
whoa! war machine's case is dv?! holy hell, i had no idea!!!! /s

that's not what you brought up and not what the last 2-3 pages has mostly been about. maybe you should try READING the crap you're replying to?

as for degree, therefore, not an idiot - hahahahahahaha. so you/someone paid for a piece of paper, and you think that proves intellect? got it. it explains why you think gender and age mean size. it explains why your entire rant supported my claim while you pretended to be arguing against it. it explains why you said you're done with this thread... yet, kept typing in it, proving to not be done, at all.

kudos, you're a special kind of smart.

I will guarantee that if/when WM is convicted he gets 10+ years due to CH and MITIGATING FACTORS (I.e. Gender and size). Will wait to bump and own the trolls once again.

lolz @ SIZE being a mitigating factor. you're hilarious. edit: (to clarify, since you clearly don't know what your own keywords mean) you seriously just claimed WM's getting a LESSER (mitigated) sentence due to size. while you tried to claim the opposite. but at least you went to clown college!

see, the term you wanted was "aggravating factors" - it's only the exact opposite of your claim. you totallllllly know what you're talking about!!

i mean... wm declined a plea deal of 14 years. so i guess you're arguing that he got smaller while in jail, so 10? because size matters!
 
Last edited:
It would appear that War Machine hasn't been getting the same vitamins in jail that he was taking on the outside.

YwnS9_9Z.jpeg


web1_warmachinecourt_010516ev_003_8026937.jpg

Or he's trying to look less dangerous lol.
 
War Machine is a fucked-up scumbag.

She is also fucked up, like most pornstars.

The two conclusions aren't mutually exclusive. The fact that she is also likely emotionally disturbed doesn't mean that in the criminal matter War Machine is any less scummy or guilty.
 
Read between the lines.

The penalties and sentences for an assault and/or battery conviction can vary widely depending on the law of the state where the offense was committed, as well as the circumstances of each case. Punishments can range anywhere from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offense and the offender's criminal history. Individuals who are first time-offenders may receive more leniency, while those who have an extensive criminal record or repeated instances of violent conduct may receive stiffer penalties.


Don't feed the trolls. Unless he actually believes what he's spouting, in that case avoid as well. Too ignorant.
 
BULLSHIT!!!! In USA a fucking child molester will get less than 2 years sometimes only probation a child rapist will get 5 years max. These creepy fucks need to get penis cut off but are given a slap on the wrist for ruining a kids life forever. They are all over America just do a search and you'll find them living in every neighborhood in the country.

http://www.familywatchdog.us/

WM only crime was he beat up a whore a grown women and can get 20 years for doing so while a child rapist only gets 5 years. Yes WM deserves jail time as no man should ever beat a woman even if that women gets paid to fuck 100's of strangers she's never met before. WM doesn't deserve to spend more time behind bars than a sick fuck that rapes women and children and if you think he does your probably on that sick fuck list above.


You have no idea what you're talking about. Source up or shut the fuck up.
 
tell me more about education, barely literate person who evades his own claim. (STILL waiting to see any evidence of size being a factor in assault sentencing!)


I showed you two separate articles on sentencing from sites that quote law that mentioned it. The problem is you're emotional and ignorant and can't admit being wrong. You did not dispute my claim about not finishing high school. You're likely a pee-on in life that with no or low end job and only time you have any power is behaving like this behind a keyboard anonymously .
 
I showed you two separate articles on sentencing from sites that quote law that mentioned it. The problem is you're emotional and ignorant and can't admit being wrong. You did not dispute my claim about not finishing high school. You're likely a pee-on in life that with no or low end job and only time you have any power is behaving like this behind a keyboard anonymously .

cool story. ctrl+f those articles and show me where it said anything about size.

oh, wait. it didn't say a damn thing about it. because size has literally nothing to do with sentencing.

you assume i'm emotional. the rest is just pure hypocrisy - despite the complete inability to back your claim, you hide in willful ignorance (i mean, you clearly didn't even read your own sources!) and insist you're right, instead of owning up to being completely wrong.

and believe i'm a high school drop out if you'd like. not sure how it helps your fragile ego to get pwned by even a lowly dropout... but believe whatever illogical drivel you need to believe.
 
You have no idea what you're talking about. Source up or shut the fuck up.

says the kettle.

try sourcing up, since you're thankfully never going to shut up. (oh, right... you can't provide a source since your claim is as fabricated as buzzfeed news)
 
Basically I want him locked up for at least however long it takes for him to not be physically intimidating... say 25 years.
 
fact: SEVERITY has literally nothing to do with the SIZE OF THE VICTIM.

How is that a fact ? That is up to the judges discretion. You're talking garbage, it's up to the judge. A judge MAY be less lenient depending on the scenario of the case, as in to say...if I go and punch say an elderly lady compared to a 300lb linebacker. Same crime but one is clearly more severe then the other.
 
Last edited:
says the kettle.

try sourcing up, since you're thankfully never going to shut up. (oh, right... you can't provide a source since your claim is as fabricated as buzzfeed news)


Yawn.....too stupid to even admit defeat.

Parents must be related...It's a reminder of the dumb society we really have.
 
cool story. ctrl+f those articles and show me where it said anything about size.

oh, wait. it didn't say a damn thing about it. because size has literally nothing to do with sentencing.

you assume i'm emotional. the rest is just pure hypocrisy - despite the complete inability to back your claim, you hide in willful ignorance (i mean, you clearly didn't even read your own sources!) and insist you're right, instead of owning up to being completely wrong.

and believe i'm a high school drop out if you'd like. not sure how it helps your fragile ego to get pwned by even a lowly dropout... but believe whatever illogical drivel you need to believe.


Nope. You didn't read the sources and have no understanding of the law. I don't expect you to, you're not a lawyer but to dismiss everyone on here that has proven you wrong shows that you really have a small IQ. Not single person has agreed with you.


Congratulations, you're the dumbest person on sherdog.
 
How is that a fact ?

because it is, as evident by your collective inability to cite any legislation or established precedence indicating that victim SIZE is a factor in sentencing. because it's bullshit. that many of you brilliant scholars believe, apparently.

That is up to the judges discretion.

giphy.gif


fact: victim SIZE isn't a criteria.


You're talking garbage, it's up to the judge. A judge MAY be less lenient depending on the scenario of the case, as in to say...if I go and punch say an elderly lady compared to a 300lb linebacker. Same crime but one is clearly more severe then the other.

...elderly lady?

wow. yet ANOTHER brilliant poster thinks that SIZE is the same as both age and sex!

there's a reason why you're consistently wrong.
 
Nope. You didn't read the sources and have no understanding of the law. I don't expect you to, you're not a lawyer but to dismiss everyone on here that has proven you wrong shows that you really have a small IQ. Not single person has agreed with you.


Congratulations, you're the dumbest person on sherdog.


show me where your source even IMPLIES anything about size. because we both know it doesn't mention it. so i'll let you move your goalpost and try to let you argue that it at least maybe might sort of imply it (it still doesn't.)

your playbook is nothing but dumb fallacies.
 
Give him ten years and remove his right arm so he's no longer able to abuse his mma training against anyone else
 
show me where your source even IMPLIES anything about size. because we both know it doesn't mention it. so i'll let you move your goalpost and try to let you argue that it at least maybe might sort of imply it (it still doesn't.)

your playbook is nothing but dumb fallacies.


I have but you're too stupid to understand and comprehend it.
 
Back
Top