Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Burning Hammer, Jul 10, 2017.
Women pee through their vaginas, what is your point?
Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
End of story.
Well a lot of things occur in nature - mantis and some spiders kill their mates 1/3 of the time - not a great argument.
Women pee through their urethra. Men do not put their penises into a woman's urethra. Have you ever had sexual intercourse before?
I guess you forgot that men have urethras, which are also "waste disposal units", and are used for sexual intercourse.
Do you understand words?
Shinkanpo's thread on super gonorrhea.
Plus I don't want to pay for their sex changes, their HIV anti viral medication, or all their visits to the proctologist when liberals give us socialized medicine.
Like I care what weirdos want to do in their bedroom.
You missed the part when it was said that consent is a social construct...
There is no question about it. Homosexuality is natural, and it is not a choice. Certain hormones released during the time spent baking in the oven cause an individual to be homosexual. There is nothing that the child does growing up, such as playing with dolls, that will make them gay.
Oh, and a lot of people that are saying they are "curious" in this thread. Hmm, curious, bi-curious. Is this a Freudian slip?
A dick is literally a waste disposal unit
On a purly evloutionary perspective I cant see the benefit of gays but theres a million different ways someones brain might develop and an attraction to the same gender is one of the more common. Fortunately homosexuality isnt harmful to individuals nor societity, in fact they've added a lot of colour to the world and I'm grateful. I have many gay friends and they're among the most hilarious and fun people I've ever met, I wouldn't change them for the world.
Its already been noted. It occurs in nature across the animal kingdom ergo its NATURAL. L-i-t-e-r-a-l-l-y
Of course the jeebus crowd and muh tradtional values will complain which is amusing given they harp on about people changing the definition of blah blah yet they have no problem changing the literal definitions with in the English fucking language.
There's also animals that eat their young, kill their mates and eat their feces. Does that mean it's ok for humans to do those things?
It's not natural. If it was then humans could all behave like that and humanity would cease to exist in 100 years.
Using the animal kingdom as an example will not help your argument, unless you believe it's ok for humans to eat their young, kill their mates, and eat their feces, simply because animals do it too.
There's been paedofiles in the past and many of them are born with that propensity. Does that mean it's ok and natural?
And blind people, mentally challenged people, handicapped people etc were not how we were intended to be. No one is saying to persecute them, but it's not what was intended, it's an aberration.
existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.
Again are we going to just make up new definitions for the English language to appease you and the other snowflakes feelings?
Yes because if nature is one thing its certainly not diverse lol God damn man.
You realize theres a difference between the words natural and morality correct?
Of course you don't.
Not to mentioning your comparing two people of the same gender banging with murder. But of course the opposition to homo crowd always resort to
A. Clearly not knowing what the definition of basic english words are.
C. Comparing homosexuality with something completely off the wall different to argue their ham fisted point.