Arab-Israeli Conflict: Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,386
Reaction score
5,626



Thread Index:
 
Last edited:
The Arabs' Historic Mistakes in Their Interactions with Israel
By Fred Maroun | July 10, 2016

  • We Arabs managed our relationship with Israel atrociously, but the worst of all is the ongoing situation of the Palestinians.
  • Our worst mistake was in not accepting the United Nations partition plan of 1947.
  • Perhaps one should not launch wars if one is not prepared for the results of possibly losing them.
  • The Jews are not keeping the Arabs in camps, we are.
  • Jordan integrated some refugees, but not all. We could have proven that we Arabs are a great and noble people, but instead we showed the world, as we continue to do, that our hatred towards each other and towards Jews is far greater than any concept of purported Arab solidarity.
1688.jpg

In May 1948, Azzam Pasha, the General Secretary of the Arab League, announced, regarding the proposed new Jewish part of the partition: that, "This will be a war of extermination, a momentous massacre, which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades."


In the current state of the relationship between the Arab world and Israel, we see a patchwork of hostility, tense peace, limited cooperation, calm, and violence. We Arabs managed our relationship with Israel atrociously, but the worst of all is the ongoing situation of the Palestinians.

The Original Mistake

Our first mistake lasted centuries, and occurred well before Israel's declaration of independence in May 1948. It consisted of not recognizing Jews as equals.

As documented by a leading American scholar of Jewish history in the Muslim world, Mark R. Cohen, during that era, "Jews shared with other non-Muslims the status of dhimmis [non-Muslims who have to pay protection money and follow separate debasing laws to be tolerated in Muslim-controlled areas] ... New houses of worship were not to be built and old ones could not be repaired. They were to act humbly in the presence of Muslims. In their liturgical practice they had to honor the preeminence of Islam. They were further required to differentiate themselves from Muslims by their clothing and by eschewing symbols of honor. Other restrictions excluded them from positions of authority in Muslim government".

On March 1, 1944, while the Nazis were massacring six million Jews, and well before Israel declared independence, Haj Amin al-Husseini, then Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, declared on Radio Berlin, "Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you."

If we had not made this mistake, we might have benefited in two ways.

Jews would likely have remained in the Muslim Middle East in greater numbers, and they would have advanced the Middle Eastern civilization rather than the civilizations of the places to which they fled, most notably Europe and later the United States.

Secondly, if Jews felt secure and accepted in the Middle East among Arabs, they may not have felt the need to create an independent state, which would have saved us from our subsequent mistakes.

The Worst Mistake

Our second and worst mistake was in not accepting the United Nations partition plan of 1947. UN resolution 181 provided the legal basis for a Jewish state and an Arab state sharing what used to be British-controlled Mandatory Palestine.

As reported by the BBC, that resolution provided for:

"A Jewish State covering 56.47% of Mandatory Palestine (excluding Jerusalem) with a population of 498,000 Jews and 325,000 Arabs; An Arab State covering 43.53% of Mandatory Palestine (excluding Jerusalem), with 807,000 Arab inhabitants and 10,000 Jewish inhabitants; An international trusteeship regime in Jerusalem, where the population was 100,000 Jews and 105,000 Arabs."

Although the land allocated to the Jewish state was slightly larger than the land allocated to the Arab state, much of the Jewish part was total desert, the Negev and Arava, with the fertile land allocated to the Arabs. The plan was also to the Arabs' advantage for two other reasons:
  • The Jewish state had only a bare majority of Jews, which would have given the Arabs almost as much influence as the Jews in running the Jewish state, but the Arab state was almost purely Arab, providing no political advantage to Jews within it.
  • Each proposed state consisted of three more-or-less disconnected pieces, resulting in strong geographic interdependence between the two states. If the two states were on friendly terms, they would likely have worked in many ways as a single federation. In that federation, Arabs would have had a strong majority.

Instead of accepting that gift of a plan when we still could, we Arabs decided that we could not accept a Jewish state, period. In May 1948, Azzam Pasha, the General Secretary of the Arab League, announced, regarding the proposed new Jewish part of the partition: that, "This will be a war of extermination, a momentous massacre, which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades." We initiated a war intended to eradicate the new state in its infancy, but we lost, and the result of our mistake was a much stronger Jewish state:
  • The Jewish majority of the Jewish state grew dramatically due to the exchange of populations that occurred, with many Arabs fleeing the war in Israel and many Jews fleeing a hostile Arab world to join the new state.
  • The Jews acquired additional land during the war we launched, resulting in armistice lines (today called the green lines or pre-1967 lines), which gave Israel a portion of the land previously allocated to the Arab state. The Jewish state also acquired much better contiguity, while the Arab portions became divided into two parts (Gaza and the West Bank) separated by almost 50 kilometers.
Perhaps one should not launch wars if one is not prepared for the results of possibly losing them.

More Wars and More Mistakes

After the War of Independence (the name that the Jews give to the war of 1947/1948), Israel was for all practical purposes confined to the land within the green lines. Israel had no authority or claim over Gaza and the West Bank. We Arabs had two options if we had chosen to make peace with Israel at that time:
  • We could have incorporated Gaza into Egypt, and the West Bank into Jordan, providing the Palestinians with citizenship in one of two relatively strong Arab countries, both numerically and geographically stronger than Israel.
  • We could have created a new state in Gaza and the West Bank.
Instead, we chose to continue the hostilities with Israel. In the spring of 1967, we formed a coalition to attack Israel. On May 20, 1967, Syrian Defense Minister Hafez Assad stated, "The time has come to enter into a battle of annihilation." On May 27, 1967, Egypt's President Abdul Nasser declared, "Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel". In June, it took Israel only six days to defeat us and humiliate us in front of the world. In that war, we lost much more land, including Gaza and the West Bank.

After the war of 1967 (which Jews call the Six-Day War), Israel offered us land for peace, thereby offering us a chance to recover from the mistake of the Six-Day War. We responded with the Khartoum Resolutions, stating, "No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel".

Not having learned from 1967, we formed yet another coalition in October 1973 and tried again to destroy Israel. We achieved some gains, but then the tide turned and we lost again. After this third humiliating defeat, our coalition against Israel broke up, and Egypt and Jordan even decided to make peace with Israel.

The rest of us remained stubbornly opposed to Israel's very existence, even Syria which, like Egypt and Jordan, had lost land to Israel during the Six-Day War. Today Israel still holds that territory, and there is no real prospect for that land ever going back to Syria; Israel's Prime Minister recently declared that, "Israel will never leave the Golan Heights".

The Tragedy of the Palestinians

The most reprehensible and the most tragic of our mistakes is the way that we Arabs have treated Palestinians since Israel's declaration of independence.

The Jews of Israel welcomed Jewish refugeesfrom Arab and other Muslim lands into the Israeli fold, regardless of the cost or the difficulty in integrating people with very different backgrounds. Israel eagerly integrated refugees from far-away lands, including Ethiopia, India, Morocco, Brazil, Iran, Ukraine, and Russia. By doing so, they demonstrated the powerful bond that binds Jews to each other. At the same time, we had the opportunity similarly to show the bond that binds Arabs together, but instead of welcoming Arab refugees from the 1947/48 war, we confined them to camps with severe restrictions on their daily lives.

In Lebanon, as reported by Amnesty International, "Palestinians continue to suffer discrimination and marginalization in the labor market which contribute to high levels of unemployment, low wages and poor working conditions. While the Lebanese authorities recently lifted a ban on 50 of the 70 jobs restricted to them, Palestinians continue to face obstacles in actually finding employment in them. The lack of adequate employment prospects leads a high drop-out rate for Palestinian schoolchildren who also have limited access to public secondary education. The resultant poverty is exacerbated by restrictions placed on their access to social services".

Yet, Lebanon and Syria could not integrate refugees that previously lived a few kilometers away from the country's borders and who shared with the country's people almost identical cultures, languages, and religions. Jordan integrated some refugees but not all. We could have proven that we Arabs are a great and noble people, but instead we showed the world, as we continue to do, that our hatred towards each other and towards Jews is far greater than any concept of purported Arab solidarity. Shamefully to us, seven decades after the Palestinian refugees fled Israel, their descendants are still considered refugees.

The worst part of the way we have treated Palestinian refugees is that even within the West Bank and Gaza, there remains to this day a distinction between Palestinian refugees and native Palestinians. In those lands, according to the year 2010 numbers provided by Palestinian Refugee ResearchNet at McGill University, 37% of Palestinians within the West Bank and Gaza live in camps! Gaza has eight Palestinian refugee camps, and the West bank has nineteen. The Jews are not keeping the Arabs in camps, we are. Palestinian President Mahmood Abbas claims a state on those lands, but we can hardly expect him to be taken seriously when he leaves the Palestinian refugees under his authority in camps and cannot even integrate them with other Palestinians. The ridiculousness of the situation is rivaled only by its callousness.

Where We Are Now

Because of our own mistakes, our relationship with Israel today is a failure. The only strength in our economies is oil, a perishable resource and, with fracking, diminishing in value. We have not done nearly enough to prepare for the future when we will need inventiveness and productivity. According to Foreign Policy Magazine, "Although Arab governments have long recognized the need to shift away from an excessive dependence on hydrocarbons, they have had little success in doing so. ... Even the United Arab Emirates' economy, one of the most diversified in the Gulf, is highly dependent on oil exports".

Business Insider rated Israel in 2015 as the world's third most innovative country. Countries from all over the world take advantage of Israel's creativity, including countries as remote and as advanced as Japan. Yet we snub Israel, an innovation powerhouse that happens to be at our borders.

We also fail to take advantage of Israel's military genius to help us fight new and devastating enemies such as ISIS.

Worst of all, one of our own people, the Palestinians, are dispersed -- divided, disillusioned, and utterly incapable of reviving the national project that we kidnapped from under their feet in 1948 and that we have since disfigured beyond recognition.

To say that we must change our approach towards Israel is an understatement. There are fundamental changes that we ourselves must make, and we must find the courage and moral fortitude to make them.

The Jews are not keeping the Arabs in camps, we are.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8388/arabs-israel-historic-mistakes
 
Last edited:
Arabs should start trading with Israel it would be their best shot at having any form of leverage to solve the palestinian crisis.
 
Summed up idiotic Arab policy rather nicely.
 
What do you guys think about the Palestinian's idea that everybody should have a do-over and go back to the original U.N partition plan of 1947, or the U.N/E.U/Arabs League's insistent that Israel needs to return all the land beyond the 1949 Green Line that they won from the Arab invaders (euphemistically referred to by politicians as the "Pre-1967 borders") as a precondition for a Two-State solution?

Personally, I think it's rather strange that the E.U and U.N keep insisting that Israel should return "the land they illegally occupy" after twarting the Arabs' multiple attemps for "Jews extermination". Wouldn't those gained territories fall under the Rights of Conquest?

I imagine the rhetorics on both sides today would be very, very different had Israel lost against the Arabs invasions.
 
Last edited:
What do you guys think about the Arabs League's insistent that everybody should go back to the original U.N partition plan of 1947, the same plan that they literally waged multiple wars to reject and subsequently lost?

Fuck em, can't trust em
 
What do you guys think about the Arabs League's insistent that everybody should go back to the original U.N partition plan of 1947, the same plan that they literally waged multiple wars to reject and subsequently lost?

Personally, I think it's rather strange that the E.U and U.N keep insisting that Israel should dismantle the settlements and return the land they "illegally occupy" after twarting the Arabs' multiple attemps for "Jews extermination". Wouldn't those gained territories fall under the Rights of Conquest?

I imagine the rhetorics today would be very, very different had Israel lost against the Arabs invasions.

Right under conquest would involve citizenship to palestinians living there or apartheid, unless right under conquest is followed with genocide AKA what happened in most of the Americas.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/trumps-top-pentagon-pick-said-settlements-were-creating-apartheid/
 
Some of those are only mistakes if you think their objective was living peacefully alongside Israel... which I do not believe was their objective. They have always wanted Muslim dominance, especially in their own region. They even said themselves they wanted Jewish extermination

Towards the end when it take about failures to capture Jewish land or not solidifying gaza by incorporating it into Egypt, those are legit failures
 
Every time an Arab coalition of countries banded together to try and wipe out Israel, Israel ended up with more territory.

Israel has been productive with the small amount of territory it controls.

Arab states should fully give up any notion of Israel going away. It's just not going to happen.
 
Every time an Arab coalition of countries banded together to try and wipe out Israel, Israel ended up with more territory.

Israel has been productive with the small amount of territory it controls.

Arab states should fully give up any notion of Israel going away. It's just not going to happen.


thanks to hard earned American tax dollars.
 
What do you guys think about the Arabs League's insistent that everybody should go back to the original U.N partition plan of 1947, the same plan that they literally waged multiple wars to reject and subsequently lost?

Personally, I think it's rather strange that the E.U and U.N keep insisting that Israel should dismantle the settlements and return the land they "illegally occupy" after twarting the Arabs' multiple attemps for "Jews extermination". Wouldn't those gained territories fall under the Rights of Conquest?
Israel should go back to 1967 borders with land swaps. Or just annex Palestine and be done with it. They won't do either in the short term, they'll continue their colonization effort to grab as much useful land as possible to change the "realities on the ground" as they call it.

The end result will be a Palestine that is not a viable territory for a state, necessitating the continuation of the Israeli military occupation. At that point I'm not sure what the Israelis will do. I don't think they have the stomach for genocide so maybe some pragmatic Palestinian leader will agitate for some autonomy and they'll accept it to leave it at that.
 
Very interesting read. I doubt most Arabs would agree with it.
 
Every time an Arab coalition of countries banded together to try and wipe out Israel, Israel ended up with more territory.

Israel has been productive with the small amount of territory it controls.

Arab states should fully give up any notion of Israel going away. It's just not going to happen.
Part of it is the Arabs are shit at cooperation. During the first Arab-Israeli war they took their victory for granted and instead focused on out maneuvering their fellow Arabs. Of course that got them their ass kicked.
 
Every time an Arab coalition of countries banded together to try and wipe out Israel, Israel ended up with more territory.

Israel has been productive with the small amount of territory it controls.

Arab states should fully give up any notion of Israel going away. It's just not going to happen.

They have already given up on that crusade, though their demands tell me they still don't fully understand their position.

The Arab Peace Initiative is a 10 sentence proposal for an end to the Arab–Israeli conflict that was endorsed by the Arab League in 2002 at the Beirut Summit and re-endorsed at the 2007 Arab League summit. The initiative calls for normalizing relations between the Arab regionand Israel, in exchange for a full withdrawal by Israel from the occupied territories and a "just settlement" of the Palestinian refugee problem based on UN Resolution 194. The Initiative was initially overshadowed by the Passover Massacre, a major terrorist attack that took place on March 27, 2002, the day before the Initiative was published.
The Arab League summit held in the aftermath of the massive Israeli victory in the Six-Day War established the Khartoum Resolution on September 1, 1967 with the "three No's" that was to be the center of all Israeli-Arab relations after that point: No peace deals, no diplomatic recognitions, and no negotiations. UN Security Council Resolution 242, which called for normalization of Israel with the Arab states and for Israel to give up territories taken during the war, was enacted on November 22, 1967 and faced initial rejection by most of the Arab world. The peace initiative, according to Oxford Research Group, represents a total break from this past.
The Arab League members unanimously endorsed the peace initiative on March 27. It consists of a comprehensive proposal to end the entire Arab–Israeli conflict. It provides in a relevant part:

(a) Complete withdrawal from the occupied Arab territories, including the Syrian Golan Heights, to the 4 June 1967 line and the territories still occupied in southern Lebanon; (b) Attain a just solution to the problem of Palestinian refugees to be agreed upon in accordance with the UN General Assembly Resolution No 194. (c) Accept the establishment of an independent and sovereign Palestinian state on the Palestinian territories occupied since 4 June 1967 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capital.

In return the Arab states will do the following: (a) Consider the Arab–Israeli conflict over, sign a peace agreement with Israel, and achieve peace for all states in the region; (b) Establish normal relations with Israel within the framework of this comprehensive peace.
Although the Initiative was adopted unanimously, there was some debate on certain issues. The summit leaders faced stiff opposition from the government of Syria, which insisted on letting the Palestinians pursue armed resistance. It also objected to the use of the term "normalization" and insisted that any such offer was too generous to Israel.

Notice how after all these years, the Arabs League isn't even sincere enough to offer a formal apology, much less reparation, for all the pointless wars they waged in a futile attempt to wipe Israel from the map, and now they're dangle their "normal relations" offer as if it's some kind of sought-after prize.

Why should Israel give up all the territories they gained after kicking the Arabs' ass and get virtually nothing in return besides their recognition, something that, quite frankly, Israel no longer give a shit about?

In order to negotiate, you gotta have something that the other side actually want or need. Quite frankly, I don't think the Arabs quite understand that they've brought absolutely nothing to the table.
 
Last edited:
They have already given up on that crusade, though their demands tell me they still don't fully understand their position.





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Peace_Initiative

Notice how after all these years, the Arabs League isn't even sincere enough to offer a formal apology, much less reparation, for all the pointless wars they waged in attempt to wipe Israel from the map, and now they're dangle their "normal relations" offer as if it's some kind of sought-after prize.

Why should Israel give up all the territories they gained after kicking the Arabs' ass and get virtually nothing in return besides their recognition, something that, quite frankly, Israel no longer give a shit about?

In order to negotiate, you gotta have something that the otherside actually want or need. Quite frankly, I don't think the Arabs quite understand that they've brought absolutely nothing to the table.
Why should the Israelis be allowed to continue occupying the way they do? Its basically modern imperialism. Give the Palestinians their state or don't and just annex the territories into Israel. They could also negotiate something in between like a permanent settlement for autonomy like in Aceh Indonesia or like what the Kurds have been agitating for.

But they don't, they continue their project of colonialism and apartheid.
 
They have already given up on that crusade, though their demands tell me they still don't fully understand their position.


Notice how after all these years, the Arabs League isn't even sincere enough to offer a formal apology, much less reparation, for all the pointless wars they waged in a futile attempt to wipe Israel from the map, and now they're dangle their "normal relations" offer as if it's some kind of sought-after prize.

Why should Israel give up all the territories they gained after kicking the Arabs' ass and get virtually nothing in return besides their recognition, something that, quite frankly, Israel no longer give a shit about?

In order to negotiate, you gotta have something that the other side actually want or need. Quite frankly, I don't think the Arabs quite understand that they've brought absolutely nothing to the table.

Israel will never give up the Golan Heights for strategic purposes and asking them to is a non-starter. They need to back off the settlements though.
 
I used to be more against Israel but realistically they are surrounded by people who want to, and have tried, exterminating them. Sure, they are acting illegally. Who wouldn't? If I were a Jew I'd be in the military just waiting to kill for Israel. And I think I'd be fairly justified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top