Shapiro is a model for the future of the right.
Well, let's take a look at the future of the left.
Yeah, I'll take Shapiro.
Shapiro is a little prude, puritanical, pussy snowflake, Mark Dice is complete full retard, Stephen Crowder is a lying fucktard court-jester idiot, and I've never heard of the other dipshit but he's not in good company.
Jordan Peterson is the best you'll do.
shapiro went to Harvard Law
so when people ON THIS SUBFORUM act like his arguments are not generally sound (negating the clear Abortion issues and his religion)......
i'm always like 'word? tell me more exalted one'
I find crowder entertaining but I disagree with him about half the timeShapiro is better than the others, but none of them are the best and brightest thinkers. These guys are really just sound-byte machines. There are plenty of idiots with microphones on the other side of the aisle too. Being the most popular is not the same as being the smartest, so yeah...
Crowder is intentionally inflammatory. Anyone who relies on using "liberals" or "conservatives" pejoratively in order to make their argument (creating an us vs them dilemma) is probably not someone that you want to spend a lot of time listening to. I get that people find him entertaining, and that's fine, but what he says shouldn't be taken as some kind of insightful truth or objective news standard.I find crowder entertaining but I disagree with him about half the time
'you all'Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude at Harvard Law specializing in constitutional law.
But somehow you all know better than him.
Mark Dice:
David Wood:
Stephen Crowder:
Ben Shapiro:
There's a difference between harsh criticism and gradeschool name calling.Shapiro is a little prude, puritanical, pussy snowflake, Mark Dice is complete full retard, Stephen Crowder is a lying fucktard court-jester idiot, and I've never heard of the other dipshit but he's not in good company.
Jordan Peterson is the best you'll do.
Neener neener boo boo.There's a difference between harsh criticism and gradeschool name calling.
Yeah but he has some decent videos. I fall off whenever anything religious comes up. I can’t sit through the argument even if I agree with it.Crowder is intentionally inflammatory. Anyone who relies on using "liberals" or "conservatives" pejoratively in order to make their argument (creating an us vs them dilemma) is probably not someone that you want to spend a lot of time listening to. I get that people find him entertaining, and that's fine, but what he says shouldn't be taken as some kind of insightful truth or objective news standard.